<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewSpace Journal &#187; Spaceports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/category/spaceports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spaceport America update, a gubernatorial visit to MARS</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/08/26/spaceport-america-update-a-gubernatorial-visit-to-mars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/08/26/spaceport-america-update-a-gubernatorial-visit-to-mars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>County commissioners in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, approved earlier this week a plan to pave a road to Spaceport America.  The paving will be paid by the spaceport project, although the county is contributing the equivalent of $200,000 in engineering and surveying services for the project, which will pave an existing road to cut [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>County commissioners in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, approved earlier this week <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_15885390">a plan to pave a road to Spaceport America</a>.  The paving will be paid by the spaceport project, although the county is contributing the equivalent of $200,000 in engineering and surveying services for the project, which will pave an existing road to cut the travel time to the spaceport for people coming from the south.   Spaceport developers are also dealing with <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_15897227">a drop in the water table in the region</a> that has affected a number of nearby residents, whose wells have gone dry as a result of heavy use of water during the spaceport&#8217;s construction, particularly when paving its 10,000-foot (3,000-meter) runway. The water table is &#8220;showing all the right signs of recharge&#8221;, said Spaceport America director Rick Homans, but residents are still concerned about any long-term affects.</p>
<p>On the other side of the country, <a href="http://www.governor.maryland.gov/pressreleases/100823.asp">Maryland governor Martin O’Malley visited Wallops Flight Facility, home to the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS)</a>, earlier this week.  Wallops is in Virginia, but close to the Maryland border; many people who work there live in Maryland.  The statement by O&#8217;Malley&#8217;s office about the visit said little about the commercial potential of the spaceport, instead playing up the impact of NASA and other government space-related spending on state&#8217;s economy.  By contrast, Virginia governor Bob McDonnell <a href="http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2010/04/mcdonnel-backs-virginia-spaceport-today.html">has played up the commercial potential of Wallops</a>, including plans by Orbital Sciences Corporation to launch ISS cargo missions from MARS using its new Taurus 2 rocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/08/26/spaceport-america-update-a-gubernatorial-visit-to-mars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/08/22/weekend-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/08/22/weekend-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Galactic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Virgin Galactic only accepting US citizens now?  That&#8217;s the claim of an article Sunday in the Irish Independent, which reports that an Irishman living in England &#8220;received a legal notice from Virgin Galactic stating that at present only US citizens can be considered for inclusion.&#8221;  The company has signed up and accepted deposits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Virgin Galactic only accepting US citizens now?  That&#8217;s the claim of <a href="http://www.independent.ie/national-news/cullens-space-dream-stuck-on-launch-pad-2307265.html">an article Sunday in the <i>Irish Independent</i></a>, which reports that an Irishman living in England &#8220;received a legal notice from Virgin Galactic stating that at present only US citizens can be considered for inclusion.&#8221;  The company has signed up and accepted deposits from a number of people outside the US, so it&#8217;s not clear what would cause this change in direction, if in fact correct.  The obvious concern would be something having to do with US export control regulations, but <a href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/04/23/most-space-tourists-avoid-itar/">Bigelow Aerospace won a ruling last year that ITAR-related agreements were not needed for prospective spaceflight participants</a>.</p>
<p>Even without that issue, Bruce Dickinson isn&#8217;t interested in flying on Virgin Galactic.  The 52-year-old British lead singer of Iron Maiden, who is a licensed commercial pilot and Star Trek fan, would seem to be in the ideal demographic for space tourism, but <a href="http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/Entertainment/2010/08/20/15089151.html">he tells QMI Media he&#8217;s not interested right now</a> because of price and safety issues. &#8220;I think I&#8217;d want to take a long hard look at those little suborbital things before I got on one,&#8221; he said. &#8220;And for the amount of money it costs, well, I could think of a lot of things you could do that would be a lot more fun, and last a lot longer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those who do want to, and are able to, fly on Virgin Galactic may be able to enjoy a little bit of a shortcut to Spaceport America.  The New Mexico Spaceport Authority approved Friday <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_15847908">a proposal to pave a road on the southern approach to the spaceport</a>.  The road, from the Upham exit on I-25, will shorten the travel time for people coming to the spaceport from Las Cruces from one hour and 40 minutes down to one hour as they will no longer have to take the current northern approach through Truth and Consequences.  The money for paving the road comes from <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_15836099">&#8220;unexpected savings&#8221; on other aspects of the project</a> because of a &#8220;good bid climate&#8221;, freeing up the $11.5 million needed for the paving.</p>
<p>That decision, as well as <a href="http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=11737">the FAA&#8217;s award of a commercial space transportation &#8220;center of excellence&#8221; to New Mexico State University</a>, <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-opinion/ci_15844906">get the seal of approval of the <i>Las Cruces Sun-News</i></a> in an editorial Sunday.  With a greater emphasis on commercial spaceflight emerging in national space policy, &#8220;NMSU and Spaceport America are poised to lead the way in a burgeoning new industry with limitless potential.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/08/22/weekend-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See WK2 and SS2 fly in New Mexico this October</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/03/29/see-wk2-and-ss2-fly-in-new-mexico-this-october/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/03/29/see-wk2-and-ss2-fly-in-new-mexico-this-october/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Galactic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least flyby overhead. The organizers of the International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS) announced today that the two vehicles will put in an appearance in the skies over Spaceport America in New Mexico on October 22, the day after the two-day ISPCS. &#8220;This will be the first long distance test flight of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least flyby overhead. The organizers of the International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS) announced today that the <a href="http://www.ispcs.com/blog/virgin_galactic_flyover_at_spaceport_america/">two vehicles will put in an appearance in the skies over Spaceport America</a> in New Mexico on October 22, the day after the two-day ISPCS. &#8220;This will be the first long distance test flight of the VG spaceship and mothership system as part of the celebrations inaugurating the completion of the runway at Virgin Galactic&#8217;s future home &#8211; Spaceport America,&#8221; the announcement states.  The two vehicles made their first captive-carry flight last week.</p>
<p>To get a feel for what it (hopefully) will be like, here&#8217;s video I shot last June in Las Cruces as WhiteKnightTwo made a low pass over the runway at the local airport, after a planned flyby of Spaceport America the previous day was scrubbed because of a technical problem with the aircraft:</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZmV6RPE35ok&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZmV6RPE35ok&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/03/29/see-wk2-and-ss2-fly-in-new-mexico-this-october/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia wants money, New Mexico wants laws</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/21/virginia-wants-money-new-mexico-wants-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/21/virginia-wants-money-new-mexico-wants-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New Mexico and Virginia have been among the leading states in supporting entrepreneurial space efforts.  New Mexico committed $200 million to develop Spaceport America and lure Virgin Galactic to their state; Virginia has supported the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS), bringing Orbital Sciences&#8217; Taurus 2 rocket there as well as passing laws to support space activities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Mexico and Virginia have been among the leading states in supporting entrepreneurial space efforts.  New Mexico committed $200 million to develop Spaceport America and lure Virgin Galactic to their state; Virginia has supported the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS), bringing Orbital Sciences&#8217; Taurus 2 rocket there as well as passing laws to support space activities in the state.  The two states, though, are continuing their efforts to support the industry, although in different directions.</p>
<p>In Virginia, new governor Bob McDonnell expressed his support for funding for MARS in a speech to state legislators Monday. &#8220;Governor Kaine committed to invest $1.3 million in the Virginia Spaceport,&#8221; <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/state_regional_govtpolitics/article/mcdonnells_prepared_remarks/318464/">McDonnell said</a>, referring to his predecessor, Tim Kaine.  &#8220;We can make Wallops Island the top commercial Spaceport in America, and I ask you to keep that money in place so that we can aggressively recruit aerospace companies and promote space tourism initiatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>A day later, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, a staunch advocate of Spaceport America, mentioned the spaceport in his speech.  &#8220;I&#8217;m pleased to report that Spaceport America is ahead of schedule and under budget,&#8221; he said in <a href="http://www.governor.state.nm.us/press.php?id=1466">his &#8220;State of the State&#8221; address</a>. &#8220;For those who doubt if the Spaceport will bring in business, you should know that Virgin Galactic has over forty two million dollars deposited for more than three hundred reservations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Richardson also called on legislators to &#8220;pass legislation allowing participants to assume the risks of spaceflight.&#8221; That&#8217;s a reference to the <a href="http://legis.state.nm.us/Sessions/10%20Regular/bills/senate/SB0009.html">&#8220;Space Flight Informed Consent Act&#8221;</a>, legislation introduced into the state Senate this year that would indemnify vehicle operators from claims of liability provided that spaceflight participants sign a waiver (with the exception of cases of &#8220;gross negligence&#8221;).  Richardson noted the legislation is needed for New Mexico to stay competitive with Virginia, which was the first state to pass indemnification legislation, in 2007, as well as Florida and Texas, which also passed related bills since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/21/virginia-wants-money-new-mexico-wants-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can Florida, Indiana, and others learn from Oklahoma?</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/17/what-can-florida-indiana-and-others-learn-from-oklahoma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/17/what-can-florida-indiana-and-others-learn-from-oklahoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rocketplane Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we noted here last week, Florida&#8217;s Cecil Field has its spaceport license but is still in search of customers, thanks to the limited number of companies whose vehicles are qualified to use it and the current state of the industry.  Cecil Field will have to compete against a number of other current and planned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we noted here last week, <a href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/12/cecil-field-gets-spaceport-license-but-will-anyone-use-it/">Florida&#8217;s Cecil Field has its spaceport license</a> but is still in search of customers, thanks to the limited number of companies whose vehicles are qualified to use it and the current state of the industry.  Cecil Field will have to compete against a number of other current and planned spaceports to attract vehicle operators, like Mojave Air and Space Port in California and Spaceport America in New Mexico.</p>
<p>And yet more spaceports are in the planning and development stages.  The Cecil Field announcement came along with word that two other sites in Florida, Kennedy Space Center and the little-known <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dade-Collier_Training_and_Transition_Airport">Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport</a>, a site in the Everglades with a single runway 3,200 meters long, are being considered by the state for spaceport status.  Also last week, <a href="http://www.theindychannel.com/news/22247861/detail.html">Indiana announced plans for its own spaceports</a>, seeking to designate two airports as &#8220;primary&#8221; and &#8220;secondary&#8221; spaceports.  <a href="http://www.in.gov/apps/lsa/session/billwatch/billinfo?year=2010&#038;session=1&#038;request=getBill&#038;doctype=HB&#038;docno=1227">HB 1227</a>, introduced in the state&#8217;s House of Representatives,  would also provide tax breaks for &#8220;space transportation technology&#8221; (and a tax deduction for the &#8220;loss of a space vehicle&#8221;) and require the state&#8217;s Department of Transportation to &#8220;develop policies and programs to encourage research and development enabling the ingress and egress into low earth orbit and near space from Indiana spaceports.&#8221;</p>
<p>People in Florida and Indiana&#8212;and other places contemplating spaceports&#8212;would do well to learn the lesson of Oklahoma, which a decade ago sought to lure companies to an abandoned air force base in the western part of the state.  Rocketplane came to the state to take advantage of tax credits the state offered, and planned to fly from Oklahoma Spaceport, the former Clinton-Sherman Air Force Base in Burns Flat.  However, Rocketplane has since run into financial problems, and in <a href="http://www.newsok.com/no-spaceships-at-oklahomas-spaceport-but-they-are-welcome/article/3432669?custom_click=lead_story_title">an article in Sunday&#8217;s <i>The Oklahoman</i></a>, Bill Khourie, executive director of the Oklahoma Space Industry Development Authority (OSIDA), seemed to suggest they were gone for good.  &#8220;It&#8217;s basically old news,&#8221; he said in a video accompanying the article. &#8220;Rocketplane&#8217;s not around any longer.&#8221;</p>
<p>The state, while hoping to attract Armadillo Aerospace or XCOR Aerospace to the spaceport, is looking at more down-to-earth options for use of the spaceport.  That includes aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul work as well as trying to get cargo companies like FedEx and UPS to make use of the airport.  The article hints, though, that the facility&#8217;s future as a spaceport might be in jeopardy.  OSIDA got just under half a million dollars in the state&#8217;s latest budget, but next year&#8217;s funding could come under scrutiny as Oklahoma, like many other states, grapple with fiscal problems.  &#8220;I sure don&#8217;t think it will ever be a spaceport,&#8221; Rep. David Dank, a critic of the spaceport and the tax credits given to Rocketplane, told the paper.</p>
<p>In the Indianapolis TV station account of the plans to establish spaceports in Indiana, Brian Tanner, director of <a href="http://www.spaceportindiana.com/Index/index.php">Space Port Indiana</a>, a company planning to establish spaceflight operations from the state, claims that &#8220;it&#8217;s a near certainty that Indiana will become a hub for space research&#8221;.  A decade ago, they were probably saying the same thing in Oklahoma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/17/what-can-florida-indiana-and-others-learn-from-oklahoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cecil Field gets spaceport license &#8211; but will anyone use it?</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/12/cecil-field-gets-spaceport-license-but-will-anyone-use-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/12/cecil-field-gets-spaceport-license-but-will-anyone-use-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>After years of effort, Florida&#8217;s Cecil Field got some good news Monday: they got their commercial spaceport license from the FAA.  The former naval air station outside Jacksonville, currently used primarily for cargo and general aviation, will now be able to host horizontal launches of reusable launch vehicles for suborbital space tourism and potentially orbital [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a style="margin: 0pt auto; padding: 0px 6px; text-align: center; display: block;" id="aptureLink_uLlnJYkSRt" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?om=0&amp;iwloc=addr&amp;f=q&amp;ll=30.2225239%2C-81.8848137&amp;hl=en&amp;z=15&amp;ie=UTF8"><img title="Aeronautical Cir, Jacksonville, FL 32210, USA" src="http://placeholder.apture.com/ph/360x280_GoogleMap/?lat=30.314802211415493&amp;lng=-81.76849365234375&amp;z=10&amp;type=G_HYBRID_MAP&amp;markers=%5B%7B%22lat%22%3A30.2225239%2C%22lng%22%3A-81.8848137%2C%22title%22%3A%22Cecil%20Field%22%7D%5D" style="border: 0px none ;" width="360px" height="280px"/></a></p>
<p>After years of effort, Florida&#8217;s Cecil Field got some good news Monday: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60A5KE20100111">they got their commercial spaceport license from the FAA</a>.  The former naval air station outside Jacksonville, currently used primarily for cargo and general aviation, will now be able to host horizontal launches of reusable launch vehicles for suborbital space tourism and potentially orbital launches as well.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just one problem: it&#8217;s not clear if anyone will use Cecil Field as a spaceport any time soon.  The license covers only horizontally-launched vehicles, so vertically-launched suborbital RLVs, like those proposed by Armadillo Aerospace, Blue Origin, and Masten Space Systems, would not be able to use Cecil.  Also, the license apparently covers only some classes of horizontal vehicles, as a section of <a href="http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/20090626_Final_Cecil_Field_EA.pdf">the final environmental assessment (EA) for Cecil&#8217;s spaceport license</a> states:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Under the Proposed Action, JAA would offer the launch site to launch operators for two types of horizontal, piloted RLVs, referred to as Concept X and Concept Z launch vehicles. The Concept X vehicle contains two turbojet engines and two rocket engines powered by Jet-A fuel and liquid oxygen (LOX). The Concept Z vehicle consists of two components &#8211; a carrier aircraft mated with a suborbital launch vehicle. The carrier vehicle would have turbo jet engines while the launch vehicle would use a hybrid rocket engine powered by nitrous oxide and hydroxylterminated polybutadiene.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The Concept X vehicle sounds like Rocketplane Global&#8217;s XP vehicle (although the XP has one rocket engine, not two) while the Concept Z vehicle is clearly SpaceShipTwo. What&#8217;s not included here is a vehicle that takes off horizontally under rocket power, like XCOR&#8217;s Lynx.  </p>
<p>The problem for Cecil is that Rocketplane Global is currently in stasis, with no guarantee that it will resume development of its vehicle (which would fly from Cecil 48 times a year, according to the EA).  Meanwhile, Virgin Galactic is committed to Spaceport America, and Cecil Field hasn&#8217;t been included among the other sites the company has publicly stated it&#8217;s interested in, such as Sweden and the UAE.  Moreover, the EA only anticipated four flights a year of the Concept Z vehicle.</p>
<p>Todd Linder, of the Jacksonville Aviation Authority, tells Reuters that his agency is working with &#8220;several potential customers&#8221;, but declined to identify them.  &#8220;The big difference between Cecil Field and the New Mexico spaceport is that we have facilities already in place,&#8221; he said.  That&#8217;s true, but arguably the bigger difference is that Spaceport America has a tenant signed up, and Cecil Field doesn&#8217;t.  Infrastructure is necessary, but as facilities like Oklahoma Spaceport can attest, they&#8217;re alone not sufficient.</p>
<p>One final note: in <a href="http://spaceflorida.gov/wordpress/?p=146">a blog post announcing the license</a>, Space Florida president Frank DiBello noted that Cecil Field isn&#8217;t the only facility that the state is contemplating developing for supporting suborbital spaceflight. &#8220;This capability &#8211; in addition to similar potential sites currently being researched at Kennedy Space Center and in Southern Florida &#8211; is critical to providing our state with the competitive edge it needs to be a key player in the U.S. space tourism industry,&#8221; he writes.  KSC has the Shuttle Landing Facility, a runway that will soon no longer be needed for its primary mission of supporting shuttle landings.  The southern Florida reference is less clear, as no specific proposal for a facility there has been announced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/01/12/cecil-field-gets-spaceport-license-but-will-anyone-use-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video tour of Spaceport America</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/12/24/video-tour-of-spaceport-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/12/24/video-tour-of-spaceport-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>KRQE-TV of Albuquerque published this week a three-minute video tour of Spaceport America from a recent tour of the spaceport, part of a new bus tour program being offered to allow the public to see the spaceport under construction. The video includes a number of aerial shots that shows the current progress on the spaceport&#8217;s long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KRQE-TV of Albuquerque published this week a three-minute video tour of Spaceport America from a recent tour of the spaceport,<a href="http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/technology/bus-ride-launches-spaceport-tourism"> part of a new bus tour program</a> being offered to allow the public to see the spaceport under construction. The video includes a number of aerial shots that shows the current progress on the spaceport&#8217;s long runway as construction crews lay down layers of concrete and asphalt.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="video" width="640" height="520" data="http://www.krqe.com/video/videoplayer.swf?dppversion=4747"><param value="http://www.krqe.com/video/videoplayer.swf?dppversion=4747" name="movie"/><param value="&#038;skin=MP1ExternalAll-MFL.swf&#038;embed=true&#038;adSrc=http%3A%2F%2Fad%2Edoubleclick%2Enet%2Fadx%2Flin%2Ekrqe%2Fvideo%2Fvid%5Fother%5F2%2Fdetail%3Bdcmt%3Dtext%2Fxml%3Bpos%3D%3Btile%3D2%3Bfname%3Donce%2Daround%2Dspaceport%2Damerica%3Bloc%3Dsite%3Bsz%3D320x240%3Bord%3D635305335098612500%3Frand%3D0%2E7805984470160637&#038;flv=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ekrqe%2Ecom%2Ffeeds%2FoutboundFeed%3FobfType%3DVIDEO%5FPLAYER%5FSMIL%5FFEED%26componentId%3D20891433&#038;img=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia2%2Ekrqe%2Ecom%2F%2Fphoto%2F2009%2F12%2F22%2FWeb%5FExtra%5FSpaceport%5FAm24b4b960%2Ddf01%2D4b45%2D9dbb%2D1b217e8521e20000%5F20091222220227%5F640%5F480%2EJPG&#038;story=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ekrqe%2Ecom%2Fdpp%2Fvideo%2Fweb%5Fextras%2Fonce%2Daround%2Dspaceport%2Damerica" name="FlashVars"/><param value="all" name="allowNetworking"/><param value="always" name="allowScriptAccess"/></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/12/24/video-tour-of-spaceport-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spaceport America developments</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/12/18/spaceport-america-developments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/12/18/spaceport-america-developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Will Spaceport America get a second paved access road?  Right now the primary access is from the north, via the town of Truth or Consequences, on a road paved earlier this year to permit spaceport construction to begin.  That results in a fairly roundabout trip for visitors coming from Las Cruces and points south: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will <a href="http://www.spaceportamerica.com/">Spaceport America</a> get a second paved access road?  Right now the primary access is from the north, via the town of Truth or Consequences, on a road paved earlier this year to permit spaceport construction to begin.  That results in a fairly roundabout trip for visitors coming from Las Cruces and points south: about 90 minutes from Las Cruces.  Earlier this week the New Mexico Spaceport Authority said it <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_13998150">seek $7.5 million from the state to pave a second road</a> that runs from I-25 at Upham, NM north to the spaceport.  If paved, the 26-mile (42-kilometer) route could cut travel time from Las Cruces to the spaceport in half.  Funds for the paving were authorized by the state legislature in 2006 as part of the overall spaceport project, but not funded.</p>
<p><a style="margin: 0pt auto; padding: 0px 6px; text-align: center; display: block;" id="aptureLink_ESdHnV0uQe" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?om=0&amp;iwloc=addr&amp;f=q&amp;ll=32.8864654%2C-107.0022405&amp;hl=en&amp;z=13&amp;ie=UTF8"><img title="Upham, NM, USA" src="http://placeholder.apture.com/ph/360x280_GoogleMap/?lat=32.812670070909164&amp;lng=-107.14553833007812&amp;z=10&amp;type=G_NORMAL_MAP&amp;markers=%5B%7B%22lat%22%3A32.8864654%2C%22lng%22%3A-107.0022405%2C%22title%22%3A%22Upham%2C%20NM%2C%20USA%22%7D%5D" style="border: 0px none ;" width="360px" height="280px"/></a></p>
<p>Later this week, though, state officials backtracked: Fred Mondragón, head of the state&#8217;s Economic Development Department and chairman of the spaceport authority, said <a href="http://www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces-news/ci_14014947">they would not seek state funds for the road because of a projected budget shortfall</a> that&#8217;s expected to sharply limit capital expenditures in the state.  Instead, he said that they will look for federal money for the road, or try to find savings from other parts of the overall project to get the road paved.</p>
<p>Mondragón also said the spaceport authority will seek legislation next year that would provide a liability indemnification for space tourism operators in the state, similar to existing legislation in Virginia, Florida, and most recently, Texas.  The bill would not protect operators from gross negligence but would provide some protection in the event of accidents, and thus reduce insurance premiums for operators like Virgin Galactic.  A similar bill was proposed in 2009 but not approved by legislators, concerned that it provided too much protection to operators; the 2010 version will be scaled back, although the report wasn&#8217;t specific as to how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/12/18/spaceport-america-developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A review of space tourism in Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/07/08/a-review-of-space-tourism-in-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/07/08/a-review-of-space-tourism-in-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EADS Astrium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Galactic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was on vacation last week in London, but that did not stop me from making a visit to the Royal Aeronautical Society last Tuesday for their &#8220;Space Tourism: A New Industry in the Making&#8221; conference.  I&#8217;ve written up some highlights of the conference in The Space Review this week.</p>
<p>One of the bigger developments at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on vacation last week in London, but that did not stop me from making a visit to the Royal Aeronautical Society last Tuesday for their <a href="http://www.raes.org.uk/CONFERENCE/PDFs/609.pdf">&#8220;Space Tourism: A New Industry in the Making&#8221;</a> conference.  I&#8217;ve written up <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1411/1">some highlights of the conference in The Space Review</a> this week.</p>
<p>One of the bigger developments at the event was a confirmation by Hugues Laporte-Weywada of EADS Astrium that their suborbital spaceplane project, launched with great fanfare just over two years ago at the Paris Air Show, is going into stasis because of a lack of funding.  They have been working on some key technologies, including the LOX/methane rocket engine that the vehicle will use, but now that this work is wrapping up the project will on until (or if) they can raise the &#8364;1 billion (US$1.4 billion) they estimate they need to develop the vehicle.  Laporte-Weywada conceded that this means that they won&#8217;t be the first to enter the market, but tried to liken the situation to that encountered by Airbus, which entered the commercial jetliner market many years after Boeing and other companies but is now an industry giant.</p>
<p>Another area of focus was on the regulatory situation, particularly in the UK.  Will Whitehorn of Virgin Galactic noted that no other country has a regulatory environment as favorable as the US, thanks to the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004, although Sweden is the closest, thanks to existing law that has governed sounding rocket launches there for decades.  (A representative from Spaceport Sweden noted that they are working with the Swedish National Space Board to get final clarification on the regulations that would govern suborbital commercial human spaceflight there.)  The UK has no enabling law, which is hindering proposals to establish a spaceport in northern Scotland. Whitehorn said he  wanted to talk with other British space companies to seek a comprehensive overhaul of UK space policy (including but not limited to commercial suborbital spaceflight regulation), with an eye towards the national elections planned for next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/07/08/a-review-of-space-tourism-in-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The groundbreaking</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/06/20/the-groundbreaking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/06/20/the-groundbreaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spaceports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Other than WhiteKnightTwo&#8217;s no-show, there wasn&#8217;t much in the way of breaking news (pun unintended) from Friday&#8217;s Spaceport America groundbreaking event in New Mexico.  The picture above shows the actual ceremonial groundbreaking, eschewing shovels in favor of some heavy equipment that will likely soon be put to use with actual spaceport construction. Later the assembled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sptam-grader.jpg" alt="Ground broken for Spaceport America" title="sptam-grader" width="400" height="236" class="size-full wp-image-964" /></div>
<p>Other than WhiteKnightTwo&#8217;s no-show, there wasn&#8217;t much in the way of breaking news (pun unintended) from Friday&#8217;s Spaceport America groundbreaking event in New Mexico.  The picture above shows the actual ceremonial groundbreaking, eschewing shovels in favor of some heavy equipment that will likely soon be put to use with actual spaceport construction. Later the assembled dignitaries scooped up spoonfuls of dirt that was poured into an amateur rocket and launched.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have some more details about this event soon, but first I&#8217;m going to Las Cruces airport to try and see WhiteKnightTwo before I have to head back home&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/06/20/the-groundbreaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
