<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewSpace Journal &#187; X Prize Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/category/business/x-prize-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:26:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Eight years later, is the suborbital industry finally ready for liftoff?</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armadillo Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Origin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masten Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suborbital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Galactic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Mike Melville raises his arms after exiting SpaceShipOne following his suborbital flight on June 21, 2004. To the left, in the yellow shirt, is Burt Rutan; in the blue shirt and cap is Paul Allen. (credit: J. Foust)</p> <p>On June 21, 2004, Scaled Composites made history in the skies above the just-renamed Mojave Air [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1716" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img src="http://www.newspacejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ss1-21jun2004-2.jpg" alt="SpaceShipOne after 2004 June 21 flight" title="ss1-21jun2004-2" width="500" height="386" class="size-full wp-image-1716" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Mike Melville raises his arms after exiting SpaceShipOne following his suborbital flight on June 21, 2004. To the left, in the yellow shirt, is Burt Rutan; in the blue shirt and cap is Paul Allen. (credit: J. Foust)</p></div>
<p>On June 21, 2004, Scaled Composites made history in the skies above the just-renamed Mojave Air and Space Port in the high desert of Southern California. Scaled&#8217;s White Knight carrier aircraft took off from the airport, with the SpaceShipOne suborbital spaceplane attached underneath. After climbing to an altitude of 14,300 meters (47,000 feet) at 7:50 am PDT, the White Knight crew released SpaceShipOne, which fired its hybrid rocket motor several seconds later. With Mike Melvill at the controls, SpaceShipOne ascended towards space, achieving a peak altitude of 100.124 kilometers (328,491 feet) before gliding back to a runway landing at Mojave. That flight was the first time a commercially-developed crewed spacecraft flew into space&#8212;if only briefly crossing the 100-kilometer <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K&aacute;rm&aacute;n_line">KÃ¡rmÃ¡n Line</a> that is a commonly-used demarcation of space.</p>
<p>That flight, and the two that followed in late September and early October of 2004 that claimed the $10-million Ansari X PRIZE, were supposed to be the beginning of a new era of commercial spaceflight. The strong public interest in the flight, the two dozen other teams competing for the prize, and the entrance of Sir Richard Branson, whose Virgin Galactic locked up a deal with Scaled and its funder, Paul Allen, shortly before the X PRIZE-winning flights, all foretold the beginning of an era when suborbital spaceflights, for tourism or other applications, would be relatively common, at least when compared to the small number of orbital launches that take place worldwide each year.</p>
<p>That future, though, has been on hold for a while. The final SpaceShipOne flight, on October 4, 2004, remains to this day the last commercial suborbital human spaceflight. Rather than putting SpaceShipOne into service, as many imagined would happen to the prize-winning vehicle since the $10-million prize purse was only a fraction of its development cost, Scaled and Allen instead put the vehicle into the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, where it hangs today next to another prize-winning vehicle, Charles Lindbergh&#8217;s Spirit of St. Louis. (Allen later revealed that the tax writeoff from the donation, coupled with the prize money and technology licensing fees from Virgin, <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1829/1">allowed him to get a &#8220;net positive return&#8221; on his investment in the project</a>.) Development of its successor, SpaceShipTwo (SS2), has gone on slowly, and other ventures working on suborbital vehicles have also seen little progress.</p>
<p>This lack of progress also has its own form of Boyle&#8217;s Law, in this case named after MSNBC science reporter Alan Boyle. &#8220;When it comes to private spaceflight, the future always seems to be two years away,&#8221; <a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2007/05/24/4351628-dude-wheres-my-spaceship?lite">he quipped in May 2007,</a> summarizing the state of the industry. At that time, for example, Virgin was planning to put SpaceShipTwo into commercial service by late 2009, a date it missed. Rocketplane Global also planned to start test flights of its suborbital vehicle by 2009, which it also missed because of Rocketplane&#8217;s financial issues that eventually forced the company into bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Now, though, the future may be a little closer than two years off.  Virgin and others are making progress&#8212;slower than they might have liked, but progress nonetheless. Customers may not be flying into space commercially this year, but their future flights may now be more like a year off.</p>
<p>Virgin Galactic remains the most visible of the commercial suborbital companies, thanks in large part to the Virgin marketing machine. Technically, though, the company is making progress in recent weeks. SpaceShipTwo took to the air on a &#8220;captive carry&#8221; flight on June 8, the first time the vehicle was airborne since a trip to Spaceport America in New Mexico last October. The <a href="http://www.scaled.com/projects/whiteknighttwo_flight_test_summaries">test log</a> indicates that this flight was a &#8220;rehearsal for glide flight&#8221;, suggesting that SS2 will fly free again some time in the near future for the first time since last September. Those flights are a prelude to powered test flights by SS2, which have been waiting on the development of its rocket motor, called Rocket Motor Two (RM2). Just yesterday they performed a static test of RM2, the first such test at Scaled&#8217;s facility in Mojave (previous tests had been conducted by Sierra Nevada Corporation elsewhere in Southern California).  &#8220;These tests provide an end to end test of all the vehicleâ€™s rocket motor systems and additional confidence before committing the vehicle to powered flight test,&#8221; the <a href="http://www.scaled.com/projects/rocketmotortwo_hot-fire_test_summaries">test log</a> states.</p>
<p>Late last month, Virgin also announced that <a href="http://www.virgingalactic.com/news/item/faa-launch-permit-gives-virgin-galactics-space-vehicles-the-green-light-for-powered-flight/">it had secured an experimental permit for flight tests</a> from the FAA&#8217;s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST). The permit is needed for Virgin and Scaled to perform those powered SS2 flight tests. &#8220;Scaled expects to begin rocket powered, supersonic flights under the just-issued experimental permit toward the end of the year,&#8221; Virgin stated in its announcement. First will be glide tests to study SS2&#8217;s aerodynamic performance with the additional weight of the rocket motor; those flights will start this summer and continue into autumn.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible, though, that Virgin could be beaten in commercial service by another Mojave-based company, XCOR Aerospace. XCOR is making steady progress on its Lynx suborbital vehicle with tests to begin later this year and the first &#8220;air under the wings&#8221;&#8212;in the form of a brief powered hop off the runway at Mojave&#8212;possible by the end of this year. A <a href="http://www.xcor.com/press-releases/2012/12-06-20_XCOR-and-excalibur_almaz-sign-suborbital-training-service.html">press release from XCOR yesterday about an agreement to provide flight training services to Excalibur Almaz</a> indicated that its first Lynx flight is planned for &#8220;later this year or in early 2013&#8243; with several Lynx suborbital flights per day by 2015. </p>
<p>There are other ventures as well. Armadillo Aerospace and Masten Space Systems are working on suborbital vehicles that take off vertically and land either by parachute (Armadillo) or under engine power vertically (Masten). These vehicles will be initially uncrewed, although Armadillo does have plans for a crewed vehicle and an agreement with Space Adventures to market those flights. Both companies have test flights planned for later this year. Blue Origin, whose public focus (or, at least, as public as the secretive company gets) has been on orbital spacecraft as part of NASA&#8217;s Commercial Crew Development program, still has plans for suborbital vehicles.</p>
<p>Eight years after SpaceShipOne first flew in space, the lack of progress can seem disappointing compared to the hopes and expectations of the crowd that gathered that sunny morning in the desert north of Los Angeles. But, perhaps, the future that we were promised that historic day is finally arriving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LLC Day 2 images and wrapup</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/26/llc-day-2-images-and-wrapup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/26/llc-day-2-images-and-wrapup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armadillo Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The X PRIZE Foundation issued a press release about the 2008 Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge Saturday, highlighing Armadillo&#8217;s Level 1 victory, their attempt at Level 2, as well as TrueZer0&#8217;s Level 1 attempt.</p> <p>Also, I&#8217;ve uploaded another set of photos to Flickr with the highlights of Saturday&#8217;s activities, including a look at launch pads [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X PRIZE Foundation issued <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/armadillo-aerospace-wins-level-one/story.aspx?guid=%7B3A99D42C-A46C-4333-9B8A-7B14E68605A2%7D&#038;dist=hppr">a press release about the 2008 Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge</a> Saturday, highlighing Armadillo&#8217;s Level 1 victory, their attempt at Level 2, as well as TrueZer0&#8217;s Level 1 attempt.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve uploaded <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/jfoust/sets/72157608386487453/">another set of photos to Flickr</a> with the highlights of Saturday&#8217;s activities, including a look at launch pads used for the competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/26/llc-day-2-images-and-wrapup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armadillo scrubbing for the day</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/25/armadillo-scrubbing-for-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/25/armadillo-scrubbing-for-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armadillo Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Pixel suffered enough damage that they will not be able to repair it in time to fly again today. Still waiting for official word, but all indications over the radio loop indicate that Armadillo will not try to fly again today. John Carmack said in a brief press conference that this problem [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Pixel suffered enough damage that they will not be able to repair it in time to fly again today.  Still waiting for official word, but all indications over the radio loop indicate that Armadillo will not try to fly again today.  John Carmack said in a brief press conference that this problem was similar to what they had been seeing in recent testing, with the LOX valve opening quickly and the fuel valve slowly.  This creates a very lean mixture that caused the nozzle to burn through.  They have enough parts to fix the vehicle but decided that they want to step back and figure out what is causing the problem rather than rushing another attempt.</p>
<p>Peter Diamandis hinted that they may try to move up next year&#8217;s competition so that Armadillo and other teams don&#8217;t have to wait until next October to try again. &#8220;I feel like a game show host&#8221; when say that Armadillo is walking away with $350,000, for first prize in Level One. &#8220;And we hope you return next time to go for the million-dollar award.&#8221;</p>
<p>Below: an image of the Pixel engine nozzle that was damaged in this morning&#8217;s attempted flight.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/armadillo-nozzle.jpg" alt="Damaged Pixel nozzle" title="armadillo-nozzle" width="400" height="463" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-737" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/25/armadillo-scrubbing-for-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LLC Day 1 in pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/25/llc-day-1-in-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/25/llc-day-1-in-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armadillo Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>I&#8217;ve created a Flickr set of images from yesterday&#8217;s activities at the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. The picture above, though, probably best represents the mood of people here at the end of the day yesterday when Armadillo Aerospace won the $350,000 first prize for Level 1. They&#8217;ll be back at it again today, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/armadillo-celebration.jpg" alt="Armadillo and X Prize people celebrate the Level 1 victory" title="armadillo-celebration" width="400" height="267" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-732" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve created <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/jfoust/sets/72157608351988980/">a Flickr set of images</a> from yesterday&#8217;s activities at the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. The picture above, though, probably best represents the mood of people here at the end of the day yesterday when Armadillo Aerospace won the $350,000 first prize for Level 1.  They&#8217;ll be back at it again today, using Pixel (a veteran of the 2006 LLC) to try and win Level 2. Look for updates throughout the day here and <a href="http://twitter.com/jeff_foust">on Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/25/llc-day-1-in-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X Prize plus four years</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/04/x-prize-plus-four-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/04/x-prize-plus-four-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scaled Composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Saturday is, of course, the 51st anniversary of the launch of Sputnik, the canonical beginning of the Space Age. It&#8217;s also the fourth anniversary of the winning of the $10-million Ansari X Prize by Mojave Aerospace Ventures, the Paul Allen-funded effort by Scaled Composites that resulted in SpaceShipOne and White Knight. This has been a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday is, of course, the 51st anniversary of the launch of Sputnik, the canonical beginning of the Space Age. It&#8217;s also the fourth anniversary of the winning of the $10-million <a href="http://space.xprize.org/ansari-x-prize">Ansari X Prize</a> by Mojave Aerospace Ventures, the Paul Allen-funded effort by Scaled Composites that resulted in SpaceShipOne and White Knight. This has been a relatively low-key anniversary for both; for the former because last year was the milestone 50th anniversary, and for the latter&#8230; well, it&#8217;s tough to get excited by the fourth anniversary of most anything. Case in point: there&#8217;s no callout of the anniversary on the X Prize Foundation web site, and when I drilled down into the section on the Ansari X Prize to <a href="http://space.xprize.org/ansari-x-prize/video-archive">this video</a>, I got the error message &#8220;We&#8217;re sorry, this video is no longer available.&#8221;</p>
<p>One reason this anniversary has slipped by is there there has been little activity in the suborbital spaceflight arena of the same high profile in the four years since SpaceShipOne&#8217;s prize-winning flight. In fact, there have been no FAA-licensed piloted suborbital spaceflights in the last four years; there have been a number of low-level test flights since then, but these have been remotely piloted and under experimental permits. That&#8217;s not to say that there hasn&#8217;t been progress, just not at the scale, or the rate, that we might have anticipated on that glorious morning four years ago.</p>
<p>As I noted in <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1222/1">an article at the beginning of this week in The Space Review</a>, Sunday night&#8217;s successful launch of the Falcon 1 might be the biggest milestone for the NewSpace industry, or at least the portion of it focused on space transportation, since SpaceShipOne&#8217;s final flight. Just as SpaceShipOne&#8217;s flights demonstrated that a private venture could develop a piloted vehicle capable of flying into space (albeit suborbitally) for a fraction of the cost of what a large aerospace company or government agency would have spent, the Falcon 1 launch demonstrated what entrepreneurial space companies can do in the realm of orbital space flight. As with SpaceShipOne, though, the issue will be how well both SpaceX and the rest of the industry can follow up on that initial success, so that future anniversaries have greater relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/04/x-prize-plus-four-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official recap</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/10/28/official-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/10/28/official-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armadillo Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/10/28/official-recap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The X Prize Foundation, as anticipated, issued a press release Sunday evening reviewing the past two days of the X Prize Cup. The release plays up the fact that Armadillo nearly won the level 1 prize Saturday afternoon despite a busted engine; the release cites fuel line contamination for the igniter problems experienced by Armadillo [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X Prize Foundation, as anticipated, <a href="http://www.xprize.org/llc/press-release/armadillo-aerospace-nearly-wins-northrop-grumman">issued a press release Sunday evening reviewing the past two days of the X Prize Cup</a>.  The release plays up the fact that Armadillo nearly won the level 1 prize Saturday afternoon despite a busted engine; the release cites fuel line contamination for the igniter problems experienced by Armadillo on Saturday. There&#8217;s not much new information about Sunday afternoon&#8217;s hard start and fire, which still eludes an explanation. &#8220;This weekend, we&#8217;ve had more problems that <em>[sic]</em> we&#8217;ve had in the last six months,&#8221; Armadillo&#8217;s Neil Milburn says in the release. &#8220;We know what went wrong, but not why.&#8221; The release also revises the attendance upwards to &#8220;more than&#8221; 85,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/10/28/official-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrapping up the X Prize Cup</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/10/28/wrapping-up-the-x-prize-cup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/10/28/wrapping-up-the-x-prize-cup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armadillo Aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/10/28/wrapping-up-the-x-prize-cup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brett Alexander, the executive director for space and X Prize Cup for the X Prize Foundation, brief the media a little while ago about the status of Armadillo&#8217;s final, failed flight. Some key points:</p> There&#8217;s still little in the way of technical information about the engine failure this afternoon. There was not a catastrophic explosion [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett Alexander, the executive director for space and X Prize Cup for the X Prize Foundation, brief the media a little while ago about the status of Armadillo&#8217;s final, failed flight.  Some key points:</p>
<ul>
<li>There&#8217;s still little in the way of technical information about the engine failure this afternoon. There was not a catastrophic explosion but instead a fire that burned for about a minute or so.  &#8220;Pieces&#8221; came off the vehicle, such as cables, but the overall structure appears to be intact.  The vehicle will be moved to a hangar shortly.</li>
<li>There don&#8217;t appear to be any plans for any further official briefings about the accident or event in general, although there will be a closed technical debrief with the judges, Armadillo team, and others this afternoon.  The X Prize Foundation plans to publish a statement later today/tonight with more details.</li>
<li>There were no injuries caused by the fire.  The closest people to it were an Armadillo team in a van an unspecified distance away; at the time of the fire they walked away from the site.  Fire engines were called in, but the fire put itself out before the trucks arrived.</li>
<li>Alexander said that despite Armadillo&#8217;s failed bids to win a prize purse, the event in general was a success.  Armadillo showed considerable flexibility in trying to win the prize, and the static displays by the other LLC teams and other exhibitors got a strong message about the industry out to the public.</li>
<li>Holloman AFB officials estimate the combined attendance over the two days of the show at 80,000, twice the size of the last air show two years ago, and higher than the 60,000 X Prize estimated would attend.  In addition, the education day on Friday attracted 6,000 people.</li>
<li>Northrop Grumman, who has a two-year deal (2006 and 2007) to sponsor the competition, was &#8220;very pleased&#8221; with the event even though no one won; they have yet to decide whether to renew their sponsorship.  Wirefly, who sponsored the overall Cup last year, pulled out rather late because of financial problems with the company, Alexander said, citing publicly-announced developments regarding that company.</li>
<li>The combination of the LLC with a conventional airshow worked well, he said. The airshow events helped fill in what would otherwise be dead time between prize events during the day (although there were still quiet periods with little going on, particularly during the times Armadillo was preparing its vehicle for flight.)  X Prize is looking at options for next year&#8217;s event, which include returning to Holloman; a decision will be made in the next few months; they are obligated under their agreement with NASA to hold an LLC competition once a year through 2010, in one manner or another.</li>
<li>Two or three other teams came close to participating this year, although none got to the point of doing untethered flights, like Armadillo has been doing for a year.  Alexander believes that more than one team will be ready to participate next year.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/10/28/wrapping-up-the-x-prize-cup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Lunar X Prize update</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/09/13/google-lunar-x-prize-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/09/13/google-lunar-x-prize-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/09/13/google-lunar-x-prize-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I just got out of some press events associated with the Google Lunar X Prize announcement this morning here in LA (where I discovered I created a little heartburn among the X Prize folks by linking to the HuffPo piece earlier this morning.) I&#8217;ll have more later, but some highlights from the announcement:</p> This is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got out of some press events associated with the <a href="http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/">Google Lunar X Prize</a> announcement this morning here in LA (where I discovered I created a little heartburn among the X Prize folks by <a href="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/09/13/next-x-prize-will-be-a-real-lunar-lander-challenge/">linking to the HuffPo piece earlier this morning</a>.) I&#8217;ll have more later, but some highlights from the announcement:</p>
<ul>
<li>This is indeed a lunar rover prize, with the goal of soft-landing a spacecraft on the Moon, roams at least 500 meters, and returns two &#8220;Mooncasts&#8221; (hi-res panoramic photos and video);</li>
<li>The prize is $20 million for the first to achieve the feat, and $5 million for the second; there is also $5 million in additional &#8220;bonus&#8221; prizes for things ranging from discovering water ice to having the most &#8220;ethnically diverse&#8221; team;</li>
<li>Google is providing the $30M in prize money, but will allow other sponsors to come in and support additional bonus prizes;</li>
<li>The prize expires on December 31, 2014, and the grand prize decreases to $15 million if the prize is not won by December 31, 2012;</li>
<li>SpaceX will provide Falcon launches &#8220;at cost&#8221; to competition participants, a savings of about 10 percent from list prizes (according to Elon Musk, who also spoke at the press conference);</li>
<li>The SETI Institute and Universal Space Networks are also providing communications support for competitors;</li>
<li>As for why do a lunar lander prize, I asked Peter Diamandis about this after the event. Their top two choices for the next big space prize they wanted to do was a lunar lander prize and a human orbital spaceflight prize.  Google was particularly interested in funding the lunar prize (and a human orbital spaceflight prize would have required at least $50M, he said) so that&#8217;s the direction they took.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll have more on this later, and also probably in Monday&#8217;s issue of The Space Review, as my schedule permits (I have a redeye back to the east coast tonight&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/09/13/google-lunar-x-prize-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next X Prize will be a real lunar lander challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/09/13/next-x-prize-will-be-a-real-lunar-lander-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/09/13/next-x-prize-will-be-a-real-lunar-lander-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/09/13/next-x-prize-will-be-a-real-lunar-lander-challenge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Later today the X Prize Foundation is scheduled to announce its next major prize competition, which has been billed as &#8220;the largest international prize in history&#8221; with a Fortune 500 sponsor. However, there is already one credible report about the prize. According to a blog post by Esther Wojcicki on The Huffington Post, today&#8217;s announcement [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Later today the X Prize Foundation is scheduled to announce its next major prize competition, which has been billed as &#8220;the largest international prize in history&#8221; with a Fortune 500 sponsor.  However, there is already one credible report about the prize.  According to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/esther-wojcicki/google-lunar-xprize-takes_b_64223.html">a blog post by Esther Wojcicki on The Huffington Post</a>, today&#8217;s announcement will be the $30-million Google Lunar XPrize.  the competition will be for the first privately-developed mission to place a robotic rover on the surface of the Moon.  The post includes a link to <a href="http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/">the prize web site</a>, which currently returns a &#8220;404 Not Found&#8221; error message.  (There&#8217;s a typo in the link in the HuffPo post: it should be googlelunarxprize.org, not googlelunarprize.org. The googlelunarxprize.org domain is registered to the X Prize Foundation, according to whois.)  The article also references <a href="http://www.google.com/space">a space section of the Google web site</a>; that, too, also returns a 404 error message early this morning.</p>
<p>If this report is correct, then it is not that surprising.  A &#8220;real&#8221; lunar lander competition had long been discussed as a potential long-term prize, either for the X Prize or NASA&#8217;s Centennial Challenges program. (NASA deputy administrator Shana Dale <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2007/sep/HQ_M07116_NextFest.html">will participate in the prize announcement today in Los Angeles</a>, NASA announced yesterday.) And it&#8217;s also not that surprising to see Google taking a lead sponsorship role, given that Google co-founder Larry Page <a href="http://www.xprize.org/about/board-of-trustees#larry">is on the board of trustees of the X Prize Foundation</a> and that Google has hosted some X Prize-related events in the past. It does sound more credible than some of the other ideas that have been floated about, like a point-to-point suborbital space prize.</p>
<p>And why should you trust Esther Wojcicki anyway?  She&#8217;s a high school journalism teacher in Palo Alto, California.  She&#8217;s also the mother-in-law of Sergey Brin, the other co-founder of Google, so she&#8217;s something of an inside source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/09/13/next-x-prize-will-be-a-real-lunar-lander-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexander joins X Prize Foundation</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/14/alexander-joins-x-prize-foundation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/14/alexander-joins-x-prize-foundation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t/Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/06/14/alexander-joins-x-prize-foundation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The X Prize Foundation announced yesterday that Brett Alexander has joined the organization as its executive director for space prizes and the X Prize Cup. In that position, according to the press release, he will &#8220;work to secure financing, create rules, recruit teams, develop rollout and media plans and investigate international partnerships for all future [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X Prize Foundation announced yesterday that <a href="http://new.marketwire.com/2.0/rel.jsp?id=741716&#038;sourceType=1">Brett Alexander has joined the organization as its executive director for space prizes and the X Prize Cup</a>.  In that position, according to the press release, he will &#8220;work to secure financing, create rules, recruit teams, develop rollout and media plans and investigate international partnerships for all future space-related prizes&#8221; run by the foundation.  He will also &#8220;create and manage content&#8221; for the X Prize Cup.  Alexander, a former space policy analyst in the Office of Science and Technology Policy, was previously a vice president for corporate and external affairs with t/Space (<a href="http://www.transformspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=about.t%2FSpace%20Leadership">he is now a senior advisor</a> with the company).  Alexander is also president of the Personal Spaceflight Federation, a position he will retain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/14/alexander-joins-x-prize-foundation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
