<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewSpace Journal &#187; SpaceX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/category/business/spacex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SpaceX did it</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/06/04/spacex-did-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/06/04/spacex-did-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 00:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orbital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">The Falcon 9 lifts off at 2:45 pm EDT Friday from Cape Canaveral, as seen in this screen capture from the SpaceX webcast.</p>
<p>If you had polled the attitudes of the people watching the launch of the first Falcon 9 on Friday, the most common feeling leading up to liftoff might be something like &#8220;hoping for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1201" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img src="http://www.newspacejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/f9launch1a.jpg" alt="Falcon 9 launch" title="f9launch1a" width="500" height="339" class="size-full wp-image-1201" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Falcon 9 lifts off at 2:45 pm EDT Friday from Cape Canaveral, as seen in this screen capture from the SpaceX webcast.</p></div>
<p>If you had polled the attitudes of the people watching the launch of the first Falcon 9 on Friday, the most common feeling leading up to liftoff might be something like &#8220;hoping for the best but expecting the worst&#8221;.  People wanted SpaceX to succeed with the Falcon 9 on Friday, but know that first launches of new rockets had no guarantee of success—something that Elon Musk and SpaceX impressed upon the community leading up to the launch.</p>
<p>So when the Falcon 9 lifted off at 2:45 pm EDT today and soared into the skies, eventually placing a demonstration Dragon capsule into nearly the planned orbit, the reaction was something approaching euphoria, even by Musk himself. &#8220;It&#8217;s been one of the best days of my life,&#8221; he said in a teleconference with reporters a couple of hours after the launch. &#8220;It&#8217;s certainly been one of the greatest days for the people of SpaceX.&#8221;</p>
<p>The launch had some drama, as well.  The launch window opened at 11 am, but because of problems with an antenna for the rocket&#8217;s newly-approved flight termination system, they weren&#8217;t ready to launch until 1:30 pm.  In the final seconds of the countdown, though, just as the nine rocket engines were about to ignite, the launch was aborted.</p>
<p>Musk said the abort was caused by a reading from an igniter on engine number three on the first stage.  &#8220;The pressure rise on engine three was higher than expected,&#8221; he said, triggering the abort.  &#8220;We looked at the data and concluded that&#8230; we were being a little too conservative&#8221; in the allowable values for the pressure in the engine.  &#8220;So we widened that band [of allowable values], reconfigured the engine three computer, and it lifted off without a problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>About the only discernable problem during the launch was a roll in the second stage that appeared to speed up as the burn continued.  &#8220;There was a little more roll than expected. It didn&#8217;t affect the mission,&#8221; Musk said.  &#8220;That is definitely something that we want to refine,&#8221; he said, adding they didn&#8217;t immediately know the reasons for the roll. </p>
<p>So how did the launch feel, Elon?  &#8220;When the rocket achieved orbit, there was tremendous relief and elation at SpaceX,&#8221; he said.  &#8220;Upon liftoff there was sort of relief that it cleared the pad; things were obviously extremely tense here.&#8221;  And his plans to celebrate?  &#8220;I think with a lot of margaritas.&#8221;</p>
<p>After consuming those drinks, Musk and his team plans to spend about a month reviewing the data from the launch to fully characterize it and look for any issues (in addition to the second stage roll) that need to be corrected.  Musk said he still planned to launch the next Falcon 9 mission, the first of three planned NASA COTS missions, later this summer.  The Falcon 9 for that mission has already been built and is sitting in Texas ready to ship to the Cape; the Dragon spacecraft that it will launch is undergoing final reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/06/04/spacex-did-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falcon 9 is ready for launch</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/06/03/falcon-9-is-ready-for-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/06/03/falcon-9-is-ready-for-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 01:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orbital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Falcon 9 on the pad at Cape Canaveral for a static test firing earlier this year.</p>
<p>If all goes as planned, SpaceX&#8217;s Falcon 9 rocket will lift off Friday from Cape Canaveral on a mission to demonstrate the capabilities of the new launch vehicle.  However, the problem with new launch vehicles is that things often [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1196" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img src="http://www.newspacejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/f9-statictest.jpg" alt="Falcon 9" title="f9-statictest" width="400" height="290" class="size-full wp-image-1196" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Falcon 9 on the pad at Cape Canaveral for a static test firing earlier this year.</p></div>
<p>If all goes as planned, SpaceX&#8217;s Falcon 9 rocket will lift off Friday from Cape Canaveral on a mission to demonstrate the capabilities of the new launch vehicle.  However, the problem with new launch vehicles is that things often don&#8217;t go as planned, a concern not just for SpaceX but for the broader commercial spaceflight industry at a key time for it.</p>
<p>SpaceX CEO and CTO Elon Musk was well aware of the difficulties of launching new rockets, something he and SpaceX have already gone through with the smaller Falcon 1, which failed to reach orbit on its first three launches.  &#8220;Historically, I think it might be something like a 50/50 shot of the first flight succeeeding,&#8221; he said in a teleconference with reporters Thursday, referring to the historical record of first launches of new rockets.</p>
<p>He does feel a little more optimistic about the chances of success with Falcon 9, citing the company&#8217;s experience and heritage of some Falcon 9 components on the Falcon 1.  &#8220;My personal assessment of the likelihood of success is probably 70-80 percent,&#8221; he said.  He did have a colorful way of putting that into perspective.  &#8220;I should point out that this is less than the probability of success in Russian roulette,&#8221; he noted. (Assuming success in Russian roulette is defined as not getting a bullet, you have a 5 out of 6, or 83%, chance of getting an empty chamber.)  &#8220;So if anybody remembers <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqakCa-MysE">that scene from <i>The Deer Hunter</i></a>, that&#8217;s tomorrow.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s one way to look at it.  It&#8217;s also worth noting that success is not a binary condition for this test flight: there&#8217;s a spectrum of outcomes between complete success and complete failure.  &#8220;One hundred percent success would be reaching orbit&#8221; with the model of the Dragon spacecraft the rocket is carrying, Musk said.  &#8220;But I think that, given that this is a test flight, whatever percentage of getting to orbit we achieve would still be considered a good day.&#8221;  He added it would be a &#8220;great day&#8221; if both stages work correctly.</p>
<p>SpaceX is finally ready to launch the Falcon 9, having overcome the last obstacle to launch, the certification by the Air Force of a flight termination system that would be used if the rocket veers off course and has to be destroyed.  Getting that approved took much longer than SpaceX anticipated. &#8220;There were I think some elements of it we underestimated, some elements that our suppliers underestimated,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>If this launch was just about SpaceX it would be one thing: the company has been through the process of developing and testing a launch vehicle before, and from their accounts seem prepared for a failure, either partial or total.  However, the launch also comes at a time when commercial spaceflight has been thrust into the political spotlight by plans by the Obama Administration to have NASA rely more on commercial launch providers, including a $6-billion initiative to develop commercial crew capabilities.  That has put a lot of scrutiny on this launch from those skeptical of, or outright opposed to, the president&#8217;s plans.</p>
<p>&#8220;I feel like sort of a political punching bag, a whipping boy, I suppose,&#8221; Musk said.  &#8220;The opponents of the commercial approach have taken a very calculated strategy of attacking SpaceX&#8221; while ignoring alternative vehicles, like United Launch Alliance&#8217;s Atlas 5 and Delta 4 rockets, that have already demonstrated the ability to safely launch spacecraft on more than 30 missions since 2002.</p>
<p>The Falcon 9 launch, he continued, &#8220;should not be a verdict on commercial space.  Commercial space is the only way forward&#8221; because of the unsustainably high costs of government programs.  He later said that &#8220;if some company like SpaceX doesn&#8217;t succeed, then the future of space is not a bright one.&#8221;</p>
<p>SpaceX will be <a href="http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php">webcasting the launch</a> starting at 10:40 am EDT (1440 GMT) Friday, 20 minutes before the four-hour launch window opens.  They also have the same time block reserved on Saturday should the get scrubbed Friday by technical issues or the weather.  In addition, <a href="http://www.spaceflightnow.com/">Spaceflight Now will have its own webcast</a> featuring Miles O&#8217;Brien, David Waters, and former astronaut Leroy Chiao starting at 10 am EDT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/06/03/falcon-9-is-ready-for-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpaceX raising another round of funding</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/04/02/spacex-raising-another-round-of-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/04/02/spacex-raising-another-round-of-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX&#8217;s Elon Musk didn&#8217;t say anything really new in his speech yesterday at the National Space Symposium in Colorado Springs, at least compared to his address last week at a satellite conference in Washington.  However, there is one new development that he did not mention in his speech.  As reported by socalTECH.com yesterday, SpaceX [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX&#8217;s Elon Musk didn&#8217;t say anything really new in his speech yesterday at the National Space Symposium in Colorado Springs, at least compared to <a href="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2009/03/25/musk-on-falcon-9-cots-d-and-protests/">his address last week at a satellite conference in Washington</a>.  However, there is one new development that he did not mention in his speech.  As reported by socalTECH.com yesterday, <a href="http://www.socaltech.com/spacex_finds___m/s-0020863.html">SpaceX has raised an additional $15 million in funding</a> through the sale of company stock, part of a planned $60-million round.  The article cites <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000118141209000003/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml">an SEC filing</a> that also states that seven investors have already invested in the offering, but does not name them, nor provides any other details about the deal (including how big a stake in the company SpaceX is selling.)</p>
<p>This is not the first time SpaceX has raised outside funding: in August <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1207/1">SpaceX raised $20 million from the Founders Fund</a>, a VC firm that includes a number of managing partners who, like Musk, are alumni of PayPal.  At that time Musk said the funding was to &#8220;top of the war chest&#8221; to ensure that the company had enough money on hand to do another three launches.  He said that if Flight 4 failed the company would then raise more money; Flight 4, launched in late September, was a success.  What SpaceX plans to do with this latest round is unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/04/02/spacex-raising-another-round-of-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Musk on Falcon 9, COTS-D, and protests</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/03/25/musk-on-falcon-9-cots-d-and-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/03/25/musk-on-falcon-9-cots-d-and-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk was the luncheon speaker Tuesday at the Satellite 2009 conference in Washington.  His speech was a general overview of what SpaceX is doing on both the Falcon launch vehicles and Dragon spacecraft, but he did offer a few new and interesting items:</p>

Musk said that SpaceX has 19 Falcon 9 orders (12 of which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk was the luncheon speaker Tuesday at the Satellite 2009 conference in Washington.  His speech was a general overview of what SpaceX is doing on both the Falcon launch vehicles and Dragon spacecraft, but he did offer a few new and interesting items:</p>
<ul>
<li>Musk said that SpaceX has 19 Falcon 9 orders (12 of which under NASA&#8217;s commercial ISS resupply program), a number that he said would &#8220;soon&#8221; be 21.  He didn&#8217;t offer any details on the two new orders other than that they are not for US Government customers.  He did add (given the audience of primarily commercial satellite professionals) that the commercial launch market was &#8220;important&#8221; to SpaceX, and that the company was in negotiations with several potential customers.
</li>
<li>The first Falcon 9 launch is scheduled for this summer.  Musk said after his speech that the biggest obstacle to an on-time launch this summer is the fairing and fairing separation system for the rocket, which SpaceX is doing in-house.  He also said that SpaceX hopes to do 2-3 Falcon 9 launches this year and 4-5 next year.
</li>
<li>The next Falcon 1 launch is scheduled for April 21, when it will launch Malaysia&#8217;s Razaksat from Omelek Island; the satellite arrived in Kwajalein just within the last few days.  Musk did note that the launch might slip towards the end of the month.
</li>
<li>Musk noted in passing that he hopes that NASA will &#8220;turn on&#8221; the option for Capability D (human space transportation) in its COTS agreement with SpaceX this year, but didn&#8217;t go into further details about the prospects for getting that done.
</li>
<li>After his speech he said that SpaceX is not affected by PlanetSpace&#8217;s protest of the commercial resupply contracts NASA awarded in December to SpaceX and Orbital Sciences Corporation.  Musk said that PlanetSpace has dropped its protest of the SpaceX award but is continuing to pursue its protest of the Orbital award: SpaceX scored better than the other two companies on technical and financial merits, but PlanetSpace did better than Orbital.  Thus, he said, even if the GAO sides with PlanetSpace in its protest, it should not affect the SpaceX contract.
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2009/03/25/musk-on-falcon-9-cots-d-and-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpaceX startles the neighbors</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/11/23/spacex-startles-the-neighbors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/11/23/spacex-startles-the-neighbors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX conducted a nine-engine Falcon 9 test Saturday night, much to the surprise&#8212;and consternation&#8212;of people in communities surrounding the McGregor, Texas test site.  SpaceX described the 177-second test at 11:30 pm EST Saturday as a nine-engine &#8220;mission duty cycle&#8221; test of the Falcon 9 first stage, and that it was a &#8220;complete success&#8221;.  The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX <a href="http://www.wacotrib.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/communities/breakingnews/entries/2008/11/23/massive_rocket_test_shakes_up.html">conducted a nine-engine Falcon 9 test Saturday night</a>, much to the surprise&#8212;and consternation&#8212;of people in communities surrounding the McGregor, Texas test site.  SpaceX described the 177-second test at 11:30 pm EST Saturday as a nine-engine &#8220;mission duty cycle&#8221; test of the Falcon 9 first stage, and that it was a &#8220;complete success&#8221;.  The test startled many people around the area, including in nearby Waco; the Waco police department reported receiving dozens of calls from people fearing the test was a bomb, plane crash, or some other kind of explosion.  Comments in the <i>Waco Tribune-Herald</i> report linked to above range from outrage that they weren&#8217;t warned in advance of the test (SpaceX apparently did provide advance notice in McGregor, but not necessarily in other towns in the area, including Waco) to humor.  A favorite: &#8220;Nothing like a glass a scotch a lawn chair a cigar and 1.5 million foot pounds of pressure to make someone feel alive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/11/23/spacex-startles-the-neighbors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X Prize plus four years</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/04/x-prize-plus-four-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/04/x-prize-plus-four-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scaled Composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Prize Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Saturday is, of course, the 51st anniversary of the launch of Sputnik, the canonical beginning of the Space Age. It&#8217;s also the fourth anniversary of the winning of the $10-million Ansari X Prize by Mojave Aerospace Ventures, the Paul Allen-funded effort by Scaled Composites that resulted in SpaceShipOne and White Knight. This has been a relatively [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday is, of course, the 51st anniversary of the launch of Sputnik, the canonical beginning of the Space Age. It&#8217;s also the fourth anniversary of the winning of the $10-million <a href="http://space.xprize.org/ansari-x-prize">Ansari X Prize</a> by Mojave Aerospace Ventures, the Paul Allen-funded effort by Scaled Composites that resulted in SpaceShipOne and White Knight. This has been a relatively low-key anniversary for both; for the former because last year was the milestone 50th anniversary, and for the latter&#8230; well, it&#8217;s tough to get excited by the fourth anniversary of most anything. Case in point: there&#8217;s no callout of the anniversary on the X Prize Foundation web site, and when I drilled down into the section on the Ansari X Prize to <a href="http://space.xprize.org/ansari-x-prize/video-archive">this video</a>, I got the error message &#8220;We&#8217;re sorry, this video is no longer available.&#8221;</p>
<p>One reason this anniversary has slipped by is there there has been little activity in the suborbital spaceflight arena of the same high profile in the four years since SpaceShipOne&#8217;s prize-winning flight. In fact, there have been no FAA-licensed piloted suborbital spaceflights in the last four years; there have been a number of low-level test flights since then, but these have been remotely piloted and under experimental permits. That&#8217;s not to say that there hasn&#8217;t been progress, just not at the scale, or the rate, that we might have anticipated on that glorious morning four years ago.</p>
<p>As I noted in <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1222/1">an article at the beginning of this week in The Space Review</a>, Sunday night&#8217;s successful launch of the Falcon 1 might be the biggest milestone for the NewSpace industry, or at least the portion of it focused on space transportation, since SpaceShipOne&#8217;s final flight. Just as SpaceShipOne&#8217;s flights demonstrated that a private venture could develop a piloted vehicle capable of flying into space (albeit suborbitally) for a fraction of the cost of what a large aerospace company or government agency would have spent, the Falcon 1 launch demonstrated what entrepreneurial space companies can do in the realm of orbital space flight. As with SpaceShipOne, though, the issue will be how well both SpaceX and the rest of the industry can follow up on that initial success, so that future anniversaries have greater relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/10/04/x-prize-plus-four-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some more details on the Falcon 1 Flight 3 failure</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/08/13/some-more-details-on-the-falcon-1-flight-3-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/08/13/some-more-details-on-the-falcon-1-flight-3-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At the annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites in Logan, Utah, on Wednesday, Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX provided some additional details on the failure of the third Falcon 1 launch earlier this month in a previously-scheduled talk about the mission. She showed the rocket&#8217;s-eye view of the launch previously released on the SpaceX web site, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the annual <a href="http://www.smallsat.org/">AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites</a> in Logan, Utah, on Wednesday, Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX provided some additional details on the failure of the third Falcon 1 launch earlier this month in a previously-scheduled talk about the mission. She showed the rocket&#8217;s-eye view of the launch <a href="http://www.spacex.com/updates.php#Update080608">previously released on the SpaceX web site</a>, but with some additional frames after the 2nd stage engine ignited; you can see some debris in the video (or &#8220;nasty bits&#8221;, as she put it), which she said included a parachute recovery system as well as the second stage engine nozzle (this particular cut of the video is not on the SpaceX web site because of ITAR concerns.)  Also:</p>
<ul>
<li>The second stage started to tumble after ignition because of the loss of the nozzle. Still, they were able to command the separation of the payload fairing, and got telemetry up to nine minutes after launch.</li>
<li>SpaceX is pressing ahead with the next launch, which will be a demonstration mission with nothing more than a mass simulator. Hardware for the mission will start shipping to Kwajalein in a week or two, and they are aiming for a &#8220;narrow&#8221; launch window in September, with another launch window in October.</li>
<li>There are two failure investigations in process, one internal and one external, but SpaceX doesn&#8217;t plan to wait until those reviews are complete before proceeding with Flight 4.</li>
</ul>
<p>Shotwell said that she had the task of explaining the failure to Elon Musk&#8217;s assistant, who is not a launch vehicle expert. After explaining what happened, she recalled, the assistant said, &#8220;You mean to say we rear-ended ourselves?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/08/13/some-more-details-on-the-falcon-1-flight-3-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The happiest launch failure ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/03/22/the-happiest-launch-failure-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/03/22/the-happiest-launch-failure-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/03/22/the-happiest-launch-failure-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A lot has already been said about the Falcon 1 launch earlier this week, so rather than recap and reanalyze the launch from a technical standpoint, I&#8217;ll make this observation.  It was initially a little surprising to hear that SpaceX people were celebrating, having champagne toasts, and, in general, calling the flight mostly a success. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot has already been said about the Falcon 1 launch earlier this week, so rather than recap and reanalyze the launch from a technical standpoint, I&#8217;ll make this observation.  It was initially a little surprising to hear that SpaceX people were celebrating, having champagne toasts, and, in general, calling the flight mostly a success.  After all, their rocket had failed to reach orbit, the one factor that counts in a launch.  In the most binary sense, this was a failed launch: being 90-95% successful is no consolation to the customer whose satellite failed to make orbit.</p>
<p>Of course, though, this wasn&#8217;t a satellite launch but rather a test flight, where that 90-95% success is actually meaningful, something I (and others) explained <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070319/full/070319-10.html">in a news@nature.com article</a> published today.  It&#8217;s still a little odd to hear people celebrating a success even as the second stage lost roll control, but in any case the launch is a significant step forward in SpaceX&#8217;s long-term efforts to develop launch vehicles and spacecraft capable of eventually carrying people into orbit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/03/22/the-happiest-launch-failure-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elon Musk, Virgin Galactic customer</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/01/05/elon-musk-virgin-galactic-customer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/01/05/elon-musk-virgin-galactic-customer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Galactic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/01/05/elon-musk-virgin-galactic-customer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday night PBS aired a pilot of a new science show, Wired Science.  (If you missed the show you can watch it online; the show is competing against two others to win a slot in the network&#8217;s lineup).  One segment of the show featured an interview of Elon Musk, where host Brian Unger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday night PBS aired a pilot of a new science show, <i>Wired Science</i>.  (If you missed the show <a href="http://www.pbs.org/kcet/wiredscience/pilot.html">you can watch it online</a>; the show is competing against two others to win a slot in the network&#8217;s lineup).  One segment of the show featured an interview of Elon Musk, where host Brian Unger first asked him questions about his electric car startup he&#8217;s funding, Telsa Motors.  Unger then turned to SpaceX and brought up a number of other commercial space ventures, like Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic.  That led to this interesting exchange:</p>
<p>Unger: Who is your competition?</p>
<p>Musk: <em>[long pause]</em> We have no serious competition. </p>
<p>Unger: None?</p>
<p>Musk: Not presently.</p>
<p>Unger: So that Branson guy&#8217;s kind of a hack, then?</p>
<p>Musk: Well, what Branson&#8217;s doing&#8212;by the way, I&#8217;m a great admirer of Branson&#8212;is really a much smaller technological challenge. So their craft would be suborbital, so it would go to about Mach 3. Our craft is orbital, it goes to Mach 25, so 25 times the speed of sound.  To do what Branson&#8217;s doing you need, say, about nine units of energy. To do what we&#8217;re doing you need 625 units of energy. The difference is monumental. So  what Branson is doing from a technological standpoint is building something that can cross the English Channel. What we&#8217;re building is something that can circumnavigate the globe.  I still think what he&#8217;s doing is great, and, by the way, I bought a ticket on his effort.  But it&#8217;s not in the same league, technologically.</p>
<p>Unger: So you&#8217;re not particularly worried?</p>
<p>Musk: The things that worry me are, are we going to make a mistake? Our own foolishness, our own errors, can hurt us.</p>
<p>Unger: So rocket science really is rocket science?</p>
<p>Musk: Yeah. <em>[laughs]</em>  It looks hard, and it&#8217;s harder than it looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/01/05/elon-musk-virgin-galactic-customer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpaceX, RpK win COTS awards</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/08/18/spacex-rpk-win-cots-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/08/18/spacex-rpk-win-cots-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Orbital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocketplane Kistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2006/08/18/spacex-rpk-win-cots-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NASA announced this afternoon that, as many people suspected in the days leading up to this afternoon&#8217;s announcement, that SpaceX and Rocketplane Kistler (RpK) won Commercial Orbital Transportation   Services (COTS) awards to develop cargo and crew transportation vehicles to serve the ISS.  SpaceX proposed the Dragon capsule, launched atop a Falcon 9, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA announced this afternoon that, as many people suspected in the days leading up to this afternoon&#8217;s announcement, that <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06295_COTS_phase_1.html">SpaceX and Rocketplane Kistler (RpK) won Commercial Orbital Transportation   Services (COTS) awards</a> to develop cargo and crew transportation vehicles to serve the ISS.  SpaceX proposed the Dragon capsule, launched atop a Falcon 9, <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/682/1">as described in an article I wrote in this week&#8217;s issue of The Space Review</a>.</p>
<p>SpaceX said in <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&#038;STORY=/www/story/08-18-2006/0004418668&#038;EDATE=">a press release</a> that they planned to perform three test flights of the Dragon in late 2008 and early 2009. RpK proposed the K-1 vehicle that Kistler Aerospace developed (and started to build) in the 1990s, with a module to carry cargo or passengers. RpK plans to perform the first flights of the K-1 in early 2008 and said in <a href="http://www.rocketplane.com/en/company/press/20060818a.asp">a statement</a> that it remains committed to its XP suborbital spaceplane, which will make its first flights in &#8220;late 2008&#8243;, a bit later than previous plans.</p>
<p>Both vehicles also plan to serve commercial markets, such as orbital space tourism; Musk has previously stated an interest in supporting Bigelow&#8217;s orbital modules.  Both companies will also be leaning on the private sector for funding to support the development of the vehicles: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14411983/page/2/">MSNBC reports that SpaceX is planning to spend around $200 on Dragon and Rocketplane would get on the order of $400 million in private financing</a>.</p>
<p>SpaceX and RpK beat out four other finalists for the COTS award: Andrews Space, SpaceDev, SPACEHAB, and t/Space.  Of the four, <a href="http://www.spacedev.com/newsite/templates/subpage_article.php?pid=580">only SpaceDev has issued a statement since the award announcement</a>, congratulating the winning companies as well as to NASA. &#8220;We will continue to look for other avenues to develop these technologies and further our capability to advance commercial space transportation,&#8221; said company CEO Mark Sirangelo.</p>
<p>Now the hard part&#8212;but also the fun part&#8212;begins: turning these winning designs into real spacecraft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/08/18/spacex-rpk-win-cots-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
