<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewSpace Journal &#187; Excalibur Almaz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/category/business/excalibur-almaz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:26:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>For the CCiCap losers, what&#8217;s next?</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/08/02/for-the-ccicap-losers-whats-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/08/02/for-the-ccicap-losers-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 01:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Origin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excalibur Almaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Nevada Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Friday morning NASA will announce the winners of the Commercial Crew Integrated Capability, or CCiCap, awards, the next phase of the agency&#8217;s commercial crew program. Already some news is leaking out about the awardees: both the Wall Street Journal and NBCNews.com report that Boeing, Sierra Nevada, and SpaceX will receive funded awards, with apparently [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday morning <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/aug/HQ_M12-143_CCiCap_Announcement_Date_Set.html">NASA will announce the winners of the Commercial Crew Integrated Capability, or CCiCap, awards</a>, the next phase of the agency&#8217;s commercial crew program. Already some news is leaking out about the awardees: both the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443545504577565532898170476.html?mod=WSJ_DefenseandAerospace_leftHeadlines"><i>Wall Street Journal</i></a> and <a href="http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/02/13091777-boeing-spacex-and-sierra-nevada-to-win-nasa-backing-for-spaceships?lite">NBCNews.com</a> report that Boeing, Sierra Nevada, and SpaceX will receive funded awards, with apparently Boeing and SpaceX getting &#8220;full-sized&#8221; awards and Sierra Nevada a smaller one, complying with the agreement between NASA and key House appropriator Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) to make no more than &#8220;two and a half&#8221; awards.</p>
<p>However, more than just those three companies submitted awards. ATK made a major push for its Liberty concept, and it&#8217;s possible Blue Origin (who, along with Boeing, Sierra Nevada, and SpaceX, had funded second-round commercial crew development, or CCDev-2, awards) and Excalibur Almaz (which had an unfunded CCDev-2 agreement) may have submitted proposals as well. What will these companies do going forward without a funded CCiCap agreement from NASA?</p>
<p>For Blue Origin, the company is likely to continue progress at a slower, but self-funded pace, relying on the investment that founder Jeff Bezos has made in the company since its inception. Excalibur Almaz, meanwhile, has shown an interest in commercial activities beyond Earth orbit: <a href="http://www.excaliburalmaz.com/pdf/052712EALPR.pdf">the company has been pushing circumlunar and deep space missions</a>, seeing better opportunities there than in Earth orbit. Company officials speaking at the NSS&#8217;s International Space Development Conference in Washington, DC, in May suggested the company primarily sought an unfunded CCDev-2 agreement to permit some technical interchange with NASA to support the company&#8217;s future plans beyond LEO.</p>
<p>ATK is another story, though: the company has invested significantly in its push for a CCiCap award, including <a href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/07/06/atks-big-liberty-push/">a media blitz in the last month</a>.  Company officials have suggested they would continue to pursue the program, but at a slower pace, without NASA funding. At the NewSpace 2012 conference last week, ATK&#8217;s Kent Rominger outlined an aggressive schedule for Liberty that called for flight tests beginning in 2014 and crew flights starting in 2015, but that schedule depends on winning a full CCiCap award. Rominger said NASA asked them what would happen if they got only two-thirds of their requested funding. &#8220;My schedule went out about seven months,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Proportionally from there it just continues to go out further to the right with less funding.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what if the reports are wrong and it&#8217;s Sierra Nevada left out of the CCiCap awards? Mark Sirangelo, head of Sierra Nevada Space Systems, also spoke at NewSpace 2012 and, during a luncheon address, talked about the perseverance the company had in the past trying to win a different NASA contract, which they finally did after several setbacks. Does that mean the company has a Plan B if they don&#8217;t win a CCiCap award? &#8220;Yeah, we have a Plan B, Plan C, Plan D,&#8221; he said. He declined to go into details about what those backplan plans are, though, saying he would want to consult with his &#8220;space family&#8221;&#8212;those working on the Dream Chaser program&#8212;before making any decisions on those plans. &#8220;We will discuss those contingency plans if necessary. This is not the time or place to do that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/08/02/for-the-ccicap-losers-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excalibur Almaz gets an unfunded CCDev agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/10/26/excalibur-almaz-gets-an-unfunded-ccdev-agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/10/26/excalibur-almaz-gets-an-unfunded-ccdev-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Excalibur Almaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orbital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The ranks of companies with Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) awards from NASA has quietly grown by one. The charter for a hearing on the program today by the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee reveals that NASA has signed an unfunded Space Act Agreement with Excalibur Almaz on October 17. There are no other details [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ranks of companies with Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) awards from NASA has quietly grown by one. <a href="http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/102611_Charter_0.pdf">The charter for a hearing on the program today</a> by the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee reveals that NASA has signed an unfunded Space Act Agreement with <a href="http://www.excaliburalmaz.com/">Excalibur Almaz</a> on October 17.  There are no other details about the contents of the agreement, including what work it covers and over what schedule.</p>
<p>Excalibur Almaz is now the third company with an unfunded SAA, after NASA signed similar agreements with <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/jul/11-232_ULA_Agreement.html">United Launch Alliance in July</a> and with <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/sep/HQ_11-300_ATK_SAA.html">ATK in September</a>. Both of those were greeted with press releases by NASA and the companies, as well as press conferences. There has yet been no formal announcement about this new agreement by either NASA or Excalibur Almaz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/10/26/excalibur-almaz-gets-an-unfunded-ccdev-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
