<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SpaceX finally launches ORBCOMM satellites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/07/15/spacex-finally-launches-orbcomm-satellites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/07/15/spacex-finally-launches-orbcomm-satellites/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Scutts</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/07/15/spacex-finally-launches-orbcomm-satellites/comment-page-1/#comment-1363755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Scutts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=2541#comment-1363755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All in good time. Obviously their first priority is to get it right everytime, due to being fixed firmly within the middle of the ULA crosshairs. Also, if they can get their stages soft landing back on firm ground, the cost of launching hardware to LEO could conceivably be reduced to well under $1,000 per kilo. That result would be great for all space flight endeavours, especially HSF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in good time. Obviously their first priority is to get it right everytime, due to being fixed firmly within the middle of the ULA crosshairs. Also, if they can get their stages soft landing back on firm ground, the cost of launching hardware to LEO could conceivably be reduced to well under $1,000 per kilo. That result would be great for all space flight endeavours, especially HSF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g.r.r.</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/07/15/spacex-finally-launches-orbcomm-satellites/comment-page-1/#comment-1362230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[g.r.r.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=2541#comment-1362230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I am far more concerned that SpaceX get their launch rate way up. They have had small glitches along the way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I am far more concerned that SpaceX get their launch rate way up. They have had small glitches along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Scutts</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/07/15/spacex-finally-launches-orbcomm-satellites/comment-page-1/#comment-1361594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Scutts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=2541#comment-1361594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope SpaceX can (quickly) get its act together with landing the first stage back on firm ground. As far as the &quot;kaboom&quot; is concerned, it seems to me that uber hot rocket motors and cold water wouldn&#039;t mix too well. Just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope SpaceX can (quickly) get its act together with landing the first stage back on firm ground. As far as the &#8220;kaboom&#8221; is concerned, it seems to me that uber hot rocket motors and cold water wouldn&#8217;t mix too well. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
