<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report claims Google considering investing in Virgin Galactic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/06/13/report-claims-google-considering-investing-in-virgin-galactic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/06/13/report-claims-google-considering-investing-in-virgin-galactic/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/06/13/report-claims-google-considering-investing-in-virgin-galactic/comment-page-1/#comment-1332647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=2466#comment-1332647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure I agree.  White Knight 2 certainly flies.  And VG&#039;s LauncherOne seems to be coming along fairly smartly, or at least much more so than the perennially snakebitten SpaceShip2.  The Newton engines do not seem to be the long-running technological soap opera that SS2&#039;s hybrid has turned into.  While celebrity space tourism is still a Real Soon Now proposition, small satellite launch may well provide VG with a decent, and stable, revenue stream fairly soon that is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; critically dependent upon glitz, flash and the whims of the &lt;i&gt;nouveau riche.&lt;/i&gt;  It would be ironic if VG&#039;s &quot;caviar dreams&quot; business line was to be rescued by revenues from its &quot;meat and potatoes&quot; smallsat business.  I suspect Google&#039;s investment, if forthcoming, will be aimed squarely at getting LauncherOne into service as quickly as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I agree.  White Knight 2 certainly flies.  And VG&#8217;s LauncherOne seems to be coming along fairly smartly, or at least much more so than the perennially snakebitten SpaceShip2.  The Newton engines do not seem to be the long-running technological soap opera that SS2&#8217;s hybrid has turned into.  While celebrity space tourism is still a Real Soon Now proposition, small satellite launch may well provide VG with a decent, and stable, revenue stream fairly soon that is <i>not</i> critically dependent upon glitz, flash and the whims of the <i>nouveau riche.</i>  It would be ironic if VG&#8217;s &#8220;caviar dreams&#8221; business line was to be rescued by revenues from its &#8220;meat and potatoes&#8221; smallsat business.  I suspect Google&#8217;s investment, if forthcoming, will be aimed squarely at getting LauncherOne into service as quickly as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014/06/13/report-claims-google-considering-investing-in-virgin-galactic/comment-page-1/#comment-1332607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=2466#comment-1332607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a terrible choice. There&#039;s several companies who actually know how to make rocket engines that would be able to put that money to better use. If Google doesn&#039;t know what they&#039;re doing in rocket development (and they probably don&#039;t - not their domain), you&#039;d think they would rely on useful signals like &quot;company has hardware that flies&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a terrible choice. There&#8217;s several companies who actually know how to make rocket engines that would be able to put that money to better use. If Google doesn&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re doing in rocket development (and they probably don&#8217;t &#8211; not their domain), you&#8217;d think they would rely on useful signals like &#8220;company has hardware that flies&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
