<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virgin Galactic relaunches its smallsat launch business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/07/11/virgin-galactic-relaunches-its-smallsat-launch-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/07/11/virgin-galactic-relaunches-its-smallsat-launch-business/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzungu</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/07/11/virgin-galactic-relaunches-its-smallsat-launch-business/comment-page-1/#comment-636461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mzungu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1762#comment-636461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small satellite market is unfortunately a myth.

The Pegasus launcher is being consider shutting down by Orbital itself:
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.spacenews.com/launch/100115-pegasus-fate-decided-next-year.html

AeroAstro(Small sat builder) is being closed down for no contract:
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.spacenews.com/military/120716-comtech-shutting-down-small-satellite-builder-aeroastro.html

Small sat are mostly government funded, and with all the budget cuts, best of luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small satellite market is unfortunately a myth.</p>
<p>The Pegasus launcher is being consider shutting down by Orbital itself:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href="http://www.spacenews.com/launch/100115-pegasus-fate-decided-next-year.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spacenews.com/launch/100115-pegasus-fate-decided-next-year.html</a></p>
<p>AeroAstro(Small sat builder) is being closed down for no contract:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href="http://www.spacenews.com/military/120716-comtech-shutting-down-small-satellite-builder-aeroastro.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spacenews.com/military/120716-comtech-shutting-down-small-satellite-builder-aeroastro.html</a></p>
<p>Small sat are mostly government funded, and with all the budget cuts, best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/07/11/virgin-galactic-relaunches-its-smallsat-launch-business/comment-page-1/#comment-633900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo Tan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1762#comment-633900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess it&#039;s possible that the demand for such a launcher has moved on since SpaceX decided to focus on larger payloads.

But I note that most of these customers are &#039;planning&#039; smallsats; do we know if many (any?) are very far along in development? Eg financing in place, committed contracts to actually &lt;i&gt;build&lt;/i&gt; them etc

IIRC VG&#039;s original ambition was $1 million per launch? (although, to be fair, I think they said they didn&#039;t know whether that would be achievable) So either the less than $10M is very conservative, or a lot has changed.

I want VG to succeed, so if they can get significant extra revenue from this great - but as you imply unproven yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s possible that the demand for such a launcher has moved on since SpaceX decided to focus on larger payloads.</p>
<p>But I note that most of these customers are &#8216;planning&#8217; smallsats; do we know if many (any?) are very far along in development? Eg financing in place, committed contracts to actually <i>build</i> them etc</p>
<p>IIRC VG&#8217;s original ambition was $1 million per launch? (although, to be fair, I think they said they didn&#8217;t know whether that would be achievable) So either the less than $10M is very conservative, or a lot has changed.</p>
<p>I want VG to succeed, so if they can get significant extra revenue from this great &#8211; but as you imply unproven yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
