<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eight years later, is the suborbital industry finally ready for liftoff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/comment-page-1/#comment-628461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1715#comment-628461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My thoughts on this issue:

http://aerospaceagenda.com/2012/01/30/space-tourism--so-close-yet-so-far-away.aspx


http://aerospaceagenda.com/2008/03/26/xcor-joins-space-tourism-race-with-unveiling-of-lynx-1-subobital-rocket.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts on this issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://aerospaceagenda.com/2012/01/30/space-tourism--so-close-yet-so-far-away.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://aerospaceagenda.com/2012/01/30/space-tourism&#8211;so-close-yet-so-far-away.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aerospaceagenda.com/2008/03/26/xcor-joins-space-tourism-race-with-unveiling-of-lynx-1-subobital-rocket.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://aerospaceagenda.com/2008/03/26/xcor-joins-space-tourism-race-with-unveiling-of-lynx-1-subobital-rocket.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Matula</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/comment-page-1/#comment-628185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Matula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1715#comment-628185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its becoming clearer and clearer that by letting the X-Prize select his vehicle Sir Richard Branson ended up backing the wrong technology. The question is how much longer he will allow it to continue before he decides the PR value is gone and its time to pull the plug. I suspect it will be after XCOR starts regular tourist flights making it impossible for Sir Richard Branson to claim VG was first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its becoming clearer and clearer that by letting the X-Prize select his vehicle Sir Richard Branson ended up backing the wrong technology. The question is how much longer he will allow it to continue before he decides the PR value is gone and its time to pull the plug. I suspect it will be after XCOR starts regular tourist flights making it impossible for Sir Richard Branson to claim VG was first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hensley</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/comment-page-1/#comment-627729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Hensley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1715#comment-627729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One can forgive the various under-capitalized ventures for the long lapse. But it seems as though Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin could easily have been flying passengers for some time now if they had focused their efforts correctly. For comparison, look at where SpaceX was in 2004 and what they have accomplished in the interim. But this is why we love having so many competitors, is it not? Let everyone take a different approach and some will get to the finish line sooner (and more successfully) than others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can forgive the various under-capitalized ventures for the long lapse. But it seems as though Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin could easily have been flying passengers for some time now if they had focused their efforts correctly. For comparison, look at where SpaceX was in 2004 and what they have accomplished in the interim. But this is why we love having so many competitors, is it not? Let everyone take a different approach and some will get to the finish line sooner (and more successfully) than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2012/06/21/eight-years-later-is-the-suborbital-industry-finally-ready-for-liftoff/comment-page-1/#comment-627710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1715#comment-627710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No - Boyle&#039;s law cannot be violated, at least until Higgs boson is found.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; Boyle&#8217;s law cannot be violated, at least until Higgs boson is found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
