<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could a contracting change jeopardize commercial crew?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-810651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-810651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just read an interesting article on http://www.parabolicarc.com/ today ...Well, This is Interestingâ€¦.
by Doug Messier on April 11, 2013, at 3:02 pm.

I just wondered, has anyone else any thoughts on this. I&#039;ve checked my calender and it definately isn&#039;t April 1st.

If true I wonder if it goes against Nasa&#039;s budget announcement, or conversely does it compliment?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just read an interesting article on <a href="http://www.parabolicarc.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.parabolicarc.com/</a> today &#8230;Well, This is Interestingâ€¦.<br />
by Doug Messier on April 11, 2013, at 3:02 pm.</p>
<p>I just wondered, has anyone else any thoughts on this. I&#8217;ve checked my calender and it definately isn&#8217;t April 1st.</p>
<p>If true I wonder if it goes against Nasa&#8217;s budget announcement, or conversely does it compliment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA pushes ahead with contracting change for CCDev &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-563858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASA pushes ahead with contracting change for CCDev &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-563858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for CCDev  In July, NASA alarmed much of the entrepreneurial space community when it announced it was considering shifting from a Space Act Agreement (SAA) approach to a something closer to a con... for the next round of its Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program. The first two rounds of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] for CCDev  In July, NASA alarmed much of the entrepreneurial space community when it announced it was considering shifting from a Space Act Agreement (SAA) approach to a something closer to a con&#8230; for the next round of its Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program. The first two rounds of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boeing on test pilots, FAR-vs-SAA, and more &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-556881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boeing on test pilots, FAR-vs-SAA, and more &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-556881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the contracting mechanism and funding for the program. Last month NASA officials said they were tentatively planning to shift from a Space Act Agreement (SAA) to a contract that would still have some of the features of an SAA but also adhere to Federal Acquisition [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the contracting mechanism and funding for the program. Last month NASA officials said they were tentatively planning to shift from a Space Act Agreement (SAA) to a contract that would still have some of the features of an SAA but also adhere to Federal Acquisition [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCDev contracting and funding concerns &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-552896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CCDev contracting and funding concerns &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-552896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] funding concerns  Last week NASA officials raised alarm in some corners of the space industry about its proposal to shift from a pure Space Act Agreement (SAA) for the next Commercial Crew Development... towards a hybrid approach that incorporates elements of both an SAA and a traditional contract. Not [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] funding concerns  Last week NASA officials raised alarm in some corners of the space industry about its proposal to shift from a pure Space Act Agreement (SAA) for the next Commercial Crew Development&#8230; towards a hybrid approach that incorporates elements of both an SAA and a traditional contract. Not [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updates on SpaceX and Orbital&#8217;s COTS progress &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-552379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updates on SpaceX and Orbital&#8217;s COTS progress &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-552379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Could a contracting change jeopardize commercial crew? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Could a contracting change jeopardize commercial crew? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was der Shuttle konnte &#8211; und was kommen soll &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-551261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Was der Shuttle konnte &#8211; und was kommen soll &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-551261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Anbieter in diesem doch eher speziellen Sektor des Raumtransportwesens aus. (China Daily 22., BBC, New Space Journal, CSM, New Scientist Blog, CNN Video 21., Spaceflight Now 19., Universe Today 15., NY Daily News 8., [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Anbieter in diesem doch eher speziellen Sektor des Raumtransportwesens aus. (China Daily 22., BBC, New Space Journal, CSM, New Scientist Blog, CNN Video 21., Spaceflight Now 19., Universe Today 15., NY Daily News 8., [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh Bugger: NASA Contracts and CCDev</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-551114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh Bugger: NASA Contracts and CCDev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-551114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the whole article for the grisly details, but here&#8217;s the part that looks ugly for Commercial Crew. NASAâ€™s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the whole article for the grisly details, but here&#8217;s the part that looks ugly for Commercial Crew. NASAâ€™s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ahrens</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-551085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Ahrens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-551085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps it&#039;s time NASA allowed the federal organization tasked with regulating commercial spaceflight (FAA) to do it&#039;s job, and not eliminate duplicate efforts of its own bureaucracy. They seem to trust the FAA in the case of commercial airflight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s time NASA allowed the federal organization tasked with regulating commercial spaceflight (FAA) to do it&#8217;s job, and not eliminate duplicate efforts of its own bureaucracy. They seem to trust the FAA in the case of commercial airflight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mohney</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-551070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Mohney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-551070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welll, the Russians did have the little issue of ramming one of their own spacecraft into Mir once upon a time, so I can kinda-sorta see why they brought the issue up. 

I think it&#039;s less of a show-stopper and more of a FUD-based issue because they&#039;ve already cleared the Japanese and Europeans to dock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welll, the Russians did have the little issue of ramming one of their own spacecraft into Mir once upon a time, so I can kinda-sorta see why they brought the issue up. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s less of a show-stopper and more of a FUD-based issue because they&#8217;ve already cleared the Japanese and Europeans to dock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Listner</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/21/could-a-contracting-change-jeopardize-commercial-crew/comment-page-1/#comment-551044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Listner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1457#comment-551044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from the deficiencies that may be in the Space Act Agreement, there is the International Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)and the leverage that the signatories, particularly the Russian Federation might exercise to stall or kill commercial space.  The Russian Federation has a proven past of bullying the United States into letting it have its way when it comes to profiting from the ISS.  Considering that it has already made waves about Space X docking its Dragon spacecraft to the ISS, it is likely to make even more demands of the United States when and if US companies gear up to transport astronauts and thus provide competition to the very lucrative monopoly that has fallen into the lap of the Russian Federation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the deficiencies that may be in the Space Act Agreement, there is the International Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)and the leverage that the signatories, particularly the Russian Federation might exercise to stall or kill commercial space.  The Russian Federation has a proven past of bullying the United States into letting it have its way when it comes to profiting from the ISS.  Considering that it has already made waves about Space X docking its Dragon spacecraft to the ISS, it is likely to make even more demands of the United States when and if US companies gear up to transport astronauts and thus provide competition to the very lucrative monopoly that has fallen into the lap of the Russian Federation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
