<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s the mystery Texas spaceport customer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceX moving ahead with Texas spaceport plan &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceX moving ahead with Texas spaceport plan &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-607871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] summer there was a flurry of speculation about an unnamed company interested in a spaceport in south Texas, on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. That speculation later focused on SpaceX, which hinted it was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] summer there was a flurry of speculation about an unnamed company interested in a spaceport in south Texas, on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. That speculation later focused on SpaceX, which hinted it was [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armadillo&#8217;s upcoming STIG vehicles, suborbital (and orbital) plans &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-560795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armadillo&#8217;s upcoming STIG vehicles, suborbital (and orbital) plans &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-560795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] run.&#8221; He said they would be interested in launching from a coastal spaceport in Texas, like the one that been in some reports earlier this summer; &#8220;we&#8217;ve even talked about launching from the Gulf [of Mexico], if we can&#8217;t find a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] run.&#8221; He said they would be interested in launching from a coastal spaceport in Texas, like the one that been in some reports earlier this summer; &#8220;we&#8217;ve even talked about launching from the Gulf [of Mexico], if we can&#8217;t find a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-560775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kendall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 01:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-560775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The customer is almost certainly SpaceX after reading some recent news reports. They are looking for a commercial-only launch site not owned and operated by NASA or DOD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The customer is almost certainly SpaceX after reading some recent news reports. They are looking for a commercial-only launch site not owned and operated by NASA or DOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mohney</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-551073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Mohney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-551073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SpaceX will &quot;neither confirm nor deny&quot; but the primary reason why a site off the Cape would make sense is that they can -- as pointed out above -- set their own launch dates without having to worry about everyone else&#039;s calendar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX will &#8220;neither confirm nor deny&#8221; but the primary reason why a site off the Cape would make sense is that they can &#8212; as pointed out above &#8212; set their own launch dates without having to worry about everyone else&#8217;s calendar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-549262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-549262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have heard rumors that Paul Allen may be doing something in the New Space space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard rumors that Paul Allen may be doing something in the New Space space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-548974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-548974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For SpaceX it would not be a &#039;backup&#039; site. Consider the number of launches they have on their manifest they will need more than just one additional site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For SpaceX it would not be a &#8216;backup&#8217; site. Consider the number of launches they have on their manifest they will need more than just one additional site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocM</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-548878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DocM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-548878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if their plans there include building &amp; testing large diameter stages there then loading them on barges for shiplent to KSC LC-39B? 

Anything larger than F9 can&#039;t really be shipped over the interstate highways as oversize loads are limited to 16 feet, then you have to deal with overhead clearance and F9 is close to maxing that already.

Bottom line is that the coastal production of large diameter is virtually a necessity. AIUI that&#039;s&#039;s why shuttle tanks were made at Michoud, LA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if their plans there include building &amp; testing large diameter stages there then loading them on barges for shiplent to KSC LC-39B? </p>
<p>Anything larger than F9 can&#8217;t really be shipped over the interstate highways as oversize loads are limited to 16 feet, then you have to deal with overhead clearance and F9 is close to maxing that already.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that the coastal production of large diameter is virtually a necessity. AIUI that&#8217;s&#8217;s why shuttle tanks were made at Michoud, LA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Carver</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-548490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Carver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-548490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transportation of the rocket is another consideration for SpaceX. The Falcons undergo testing at MacGregor, TX, before being shipped to the launch site. South Texas is a lot closer than south Florida.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transportation of the rocket is another consideration for SpaceX. The Falcons undergo testing at MacGregor, TX, before being shipped to the launch site. South Texas is a lot closer than south Florida.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary C Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-547966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary C Hudson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-547966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A correction: it is a patent *application*, not an issued patent.  And Claim 1 is totally invalidated by prior art, for example Bob Truax&#039;s proposal under the NRL SELARS program of the early 1990s to do recovery of his first stage on a barge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A correction: it is a patent *application*, not an issued patent.  And Claim 1 is totally invalidated by prior art, for example Bob Truax&#8217;s proposal under the NRL SELARS program of the early 1990s to do recovery of his first stage on a barge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WIREDRAGON: SPACE INDUSTRY NEWS LINKS</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2011/07/04/whos-the-mystery-texas-spaceport-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-547220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WIREDRAGON: SPACE INDUSTRY NEWS LINKS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1453#comment-547220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Dormant spaceport project comes back to life [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dormant spaceport project comes back to life [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
