<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orbital&#8217;s commercial crew interest isn&#8217;t new</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCDev-2 losers &#171; Aerospace Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-530700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CCDev-2 losers &#171; Aerospace Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1353#comment-530700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] body concept called Prometheus launched on an EELV, building upon interest in commercial crew that dates back to the 1990s.Â  Failure to secure a CCDev-2 award will put the company into a tough spot: should they continue [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] body concept called Prometheus launched on an EELV, building upon interest in commercial crew that dates back to the 1990s.Â  Failure to secure a CCDev-2 award will put the company into a tough spot: should they continue [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assessing the CCDev-2 losers &#171; NewSpace Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-525546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assessing the CCDev-2 losers &#171; NewSpace Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1353#comment-525546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] body concept called Prometheus launched on an EELV, building upon interest in commercial crew that dates back to the 1990s. Failure to secure a CCDev-2 award will put the company into a tough spot: should they continue to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] body concept called Prometheus launched on an EELV, building upon interest in commercial crew that dates back to the 1990s. Failure to secure a CCDev-2 award will put the company into a tough spot: should they continue to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To the End of the Solar System: The Story of the Nuclear Rocket</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-484127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[To the End of the Solar System: The Story of the Nuclear Rocket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1353#comment-484127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Related Nuclear Rocket Products  For more on this read: http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/23/virgins-will-whitehorn-to-retire/   Additionally you can check out this related post: http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Related Nuclear Rocket Products  For more on this read: <a href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/23/virgins-will-whitehorn-to-retire/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/23/virgins-will-whitehorn-to-retire/</a>   Additionally you can check out this related post: <a href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Shelby: don&#8217;t blame me; New Mexico uncertainty; a prescient CCDev vision</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2010/12/29/orbitals-commercial-crew-interest-isnt-new/comment-page-1/#comment-483371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Shelby: don&#8217;t blame me; New Mexico uncertainty; a prescient CCDev vision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspacejournal.com/?p=1353#comment-483371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] an EELV or other rocket&#8212;dating back over a decade. As I noted on NewSpace Journal yesterday, Orbital&#8217;s vision back then of how such a system should be developed and operated was quite similar to NASA&#8217;s current plans and the proponents of present-day CCDev proponents. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] an EELV or other rocket&#8212;dating back over a decade. As I noted on NewSpace Journal yesterday, Orbital&#8217;s vision back then of how such a system should be developed and operated was quite similar to NASA&#8217;s current plans and the proponents of present-day CCDev proponents. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
