<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rocket piloting: as exciting as operating elevators?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Spaceflight &#187; Followup on the excitement of rocket piloting</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-245238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Personal Spaceflight &#187; Followup on the excitement of rocket piloting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-245238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] follow up on a posting from during the Space Access &#8217;08 conference, I have an article in this week&#8217;s issue of The Space Review examining what it will take to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] follow up on a posting from during the Space Access &#8217;08 conference, I have an article in this week&#8217;s issue of The Space Review examining what it will take to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-244392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-244392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;FAA will need to certify it or people will die.&lt;/em&gt;

Again, the FAA is not responsible for the safety of passengers in space vehicles.  There is no procedure in place or regulatory authority for the FAA to &quot;certify&quot; Armadillo&#039;s avionics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>FAA will need to certify it or people will die.</em></p>
<p>Again, the FAA is not responsible for the safety of passengers in space vehicles.  There is no procedure in place or regulatory authority for the FAA to &#8220;certify&#8221; Armadillo&#8217;s avionics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-244009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-244009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the FAA will need to certify it or people will die.&quot;

Pardon? Does FAA certification somehow make avionics safer?  Since you&#039;re  fan of Burt Rutan, you&#039;d probably be interested in knowing that it&#039;s his opinion that FAA certification makes passengers LESS safe, since their methods discourage safety-improving innovation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the FAA will need to certify it or people will die.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pardon? Does FAA certification somehow make avionics safer?  Since you&#8217;re  fan of Burt Rutan, you&#8217;d probably be interested in knowing that it&#8217;s his opinion that FAA certification makes passengers LESS safe, since their methods discourage safety-improving innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Rocket piloting: as exciting as operating elevators?</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-243999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Rocket piloting: as exciting as operating elevators?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-243999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/   &#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/" rel="nofollow">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/</a>   &nbsp; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Access 2008 - Out of the Cradle</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-243766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Access 2008 - Out of the Cradle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-243766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Rocket Pilot Session [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Rocket Pilot Session [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-243734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-243734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m very well aware that FAA and/or AST is not certifying the VEHICLES.  I said AVIONICS.  If it leaves the ground and is fly-by-wire (like Armadillo&#039;s) or the vehicles operators depend on the avionics for safe flight the FAA will need to certify it or people will die.

You cannot operate a commercial airborne vehicle of any kind without certified avionics.  This is why Burt Rutan kept SS1 a mechanically control vehicle with backup &quot;old school&quot; instruments.

Besides, I wouldn&#039;t want to fly in a fly-by-wire vehicle with as many software glitches as Microsoft Windows...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very well aware that FAA and/or AST is not certifying the VEHICLES.  I said AVIONICS.  If it leaves the ground and is fly-by-wire (like Armadillo&#8217;s) or the vehicles operators depend on the avionics for safe flight the FAA will need to certify it or people will die.</p>
<p>You cannot operate a commercial airborne vehicle of any kind without certified avionics.  This is why Burt Rutan kept SS1 a mechanically control vehicle with backup &#8220;old school&#8221; instruments.</p>
<p>Besides, I wouldn&#8217;t want to fly in a fly-by-wire vehicle with as many software glitches as Microsoft Windows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-243637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-243637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;...certifying that software as avionics in a man-rated aerospace vehicle with the FAA would be enormously expensive. It could cost as much as the vehicle itself.&lt;/em&gt;

a) FAA-AST does not certify space vehicles.
b) &quot;Man rating&quot; is meaningless in this context.
c) FAA-AST is not responsible for passenger safety, only that of uninvolved third parties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8230;certifying that software as avionics in a man-rated aerospace vehicle with the FAA would be enormously expensive. It could cost as much as the vehicle itself.</em></p>
<p>a) FAA-AST does not certify space vehicles.<br />
b) &#8220;Man rating&#8221; is meaningless in this context.<br />
c) FAA-AST is not responsible for passenger safety, only that of uninvolved third parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Shearer</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-243462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Shearer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-243462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m forced to disagree with Carmack.  Burt Rutan has said many times that if space tourism is ever going to be cheap enough, safe enough and reliable enough it&#039;s going to need to be stick and rudder.  Armadillo has come up with some really good software to run their flight laws but certifying that software as avionics in a man-rated aerospace vehicle with the FAA would be enormously expensive.  It could cost as much as the vehicle itself.

Besides, even if it was just a big green button that says &quot;GO&quot; and the pilot/operator just has to press it, and even if this operator does four flights a day, five days a week I think it&#039;s still one hell of a job!  As a pilot myself I&#039;d still love to be the one to hit that button.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m forced to disagree with Carmack.  Burt Rutan has said many times that if space tourism is ever going to be cheap enough, safe enough and reliable enough it&#8217;s going to need to be stick and rudder.  Armadillo has come up with some really good software to run their flight laws but certifying that software as avionics in a man-rated aerospace vehicle with the FAA would be enormously expensive.  It could cost as much as the vehicle itself.</p>
<p>Besides, even if it was just a big green button that says &#8220;GO&#8221; and the pilot/operator just has to press it, and even if this operator does four flights a day, five days a week I think it&#8217;s still one hell of a job!  As a pilot myself I&#8217;d still love to be the one to hit that button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Motherway</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/comment-page-1/#comment-243409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Motherway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2008/03/28/rocket-piloting-as-exciting-as-operating-elevators/#comment-243409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, I&#039;m inspired. . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I&#8217;m inspired. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
