<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EADS getting into the space tourism market?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Spaceflight &#187; EADS reinvents Rocketplane</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/comment-page-1/#comment-159242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Personal Spaceflight &#187; EADS reinvents Rocketplane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/#comment-159242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] actual vehicle design is somewhat different from the Rocketplane XP.) It also appears that those earlier reports about the use of an A380F as a carrier aircraft turned out to be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] actual vehicle design is somewhat different from the Rocketplane XP.) It also appears that those earlier reports about the use of an A380F as a carrier aircraft turned out to be [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/comment-page-1/#comment-158738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/#comment-158738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;EADS getting into the space tourism market?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Some analysis on reports that EADS is about to enter the suborbital space tourism business using a freighter version of the A380 as a carrier aircraft....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EADS getting into the space tourism market?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Some analysis on reports that EADS is about to enter the suborbital space tourism business using a freighter version of the A380 as a carrier aircraft&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/comment-page-1/#comment-158586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrett Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/06/12/eads-getting-into-the-space-tourism-market/#comment-158586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt the A380 being used as a carrier aircraft for a commercially viable space tourism operation.  Operations costs for the A380 would add an additional cost burden to the suborbital flight.  It would make more sense to do a piggyback launch from an A330-Freighter that could be leased on a daily basis.  The same A330 Freighter could be modified to perform parabolic flights in order to compete with Zero Gravity&#039;s 727, if the legal issues are resolved to permit parabolic passenger flights.

The FlightGlobal article talks about &quot;serial launching&quot; from a rear door of the A380 freighter.  The A380 freighter is not a military aircraft with a rear ramp, but rather a commercial aircraft with a side door.  Major structural modifications would be necessary to adapt the A380, greater than modifications to an A330.

I also have trouble understanding why passengers would want to be constrained to launching with another group.  I would be a very upset passenger if my flight were cancelled due to a minor technical glitch or other problem with the first spacecraft which was supposed to launch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the A380 being used as a carrier aircraft for a commercially viable space tourism operation.  Operations costs for the A380 would add an additional cost burden to the suborbital flight.  It would make more sense to do a piggyback launch from an A330-Freighter that could be leased on a daily basis.  The same A330 Freighter could be modified to perform parabolic flights in order to compete with Zero Gravity&#8217;s 727, if the legal issues are resolved to permit parabolic passenger flights.</p>
<p>The FlightGlobal article talks about &#8220;serial launching&#8221; from a rear door of the A380 freighter.  The A380 freighter is not a military aircraft with a rear ramp, but rather a commercial aircraft with a side door.  Major structural modifications would be necessary to adapt the A380, greater than modifications to an A330.</p>
<p>I also have trouble understanding why passengers would want to be constrained to launching with another group.  I would be a very upset passenger if my flight were cancelled due to a minor technical glitch or other problem with the first spacecraft which was supposed to launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
