<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confusing news about public interest in space tourism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/05/06/confusing-news-about-public-interest-in-space-tourism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/05/06/confusing-news-about-public-interest-in-space-tourism/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Shearer</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/05/06/confusing-news-about-public-interest-in-space-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-145137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Shearer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/05/06/confusing-news-about-public-interest-in-space-tourism/#comment-145137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market research is a tricky business...  market research in Space Tourism...  REALLY tricky it seems.  All I know is... I&#039;d throw off the numbers real quick.

Would I go...if money were no issue?
Sub-orbital  100% Yes (as a warm-up)
Orbital      100% Yes (would like to experience sleeping weightless)
Moon         100% YES (Would I have to come back???)
Mars          40% yes (I agree with Burt, it looks as bad as Mojave... ;)

The desire to go into space is so strong (for me anyways) that I wonder if there&#039;d be desire to come back (to earth)?  I think that when the desire to come back kicks in (seeing earth in all &quot;her&quot; beauty)... THAT&#039;ll be the true THRILL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market research is a tricky business&#8230;  market research in Space Tourism&#8230;  REALLY tricky it seems.  All I know is&#8230; I&#8217;d throw off the numbers real quick.</p>
<p>Would I go&#8230;if money were no issue?<br />
Sub-orbital  100% Yes (as a warm-up)<br />
Orbital      100% Yes (would like to experience sleeping weightless)<br />
Moon         100% YES (Would I have to come back???)<br />
Mars          40% yes (I agree with Burt, it looks as bad as Mojave&#8230; <img src="http://www.newspacejournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>The desire to go into space is so strong (for me anyways) that I wonder if there&#8217;d be desire to come back (to earth)?  I think that when the desire to come back kicks in (seeing earth in all &#8220;her&#8221; beauty)&#8230; THAT&#8217;ll be the true THRILL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Mixed messages</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/05/06/confusing-news-about-public-interest-in-space-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-144841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Mixed messages]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 20:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/05/06/confusing-news-about-public-interest-in-space-tourism/#comment-144841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] suggest a lack of sophistication. (I noted on Personal Spaceflight something similar about aspects of the poll dealing with space tourism.) Elsewhere, 54 percent of respondents said that NASA&#8217;s plans to return to the Moon should be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] suggest a lack of sophistication. (I noted on Personal Spaceflight something similar about aspects of the poll dealing with space tourism.) Elsewhere, 54 percent of respondents said that NASA&#8217;s plans to return to the Moon should be [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
