<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deals for PlanetSpace, t/Space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/02/02/deals-for-planetspace-tspace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/02/02/deals-for-planetspace-tspace/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/02/02/deals-for-planetspace-tspace/comment-page-1/#comment-73725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/02/02/deals-for-planetspace-tspace/#comment-73725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete, I kinda think it may be just you - I&#039;d definatly say that if you rate the the 2 COTS canidates, plus these 2, I&#039;d say, that while Planetspace is at the bottom of the four, it definatly has something.  They&#039;ve got serious discussions going on in Ohio, and it from the sounds of it, the Cape Brenton deal is quite far along.  

That said, there a question about hardware development, and that makes mere a little nervous, but one could easily argue that much of the Hardware for TSpace hasn&#039;t been developed a whole lot either]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, I kinda think it may be just you &#8211; I&#8217;d definatly say that if you rate the the 2 COTS canidates, plus these 2, I&#8217;d say, that while Planetspace is at the bottom of the four, it definatly has something.  They&#8217;ve got serious discussions going on in Ohio, and it from the sounds of it, the Cape Brenton deal is quite far along.  </p>
<p>That said, there a question about hardware development, and that makes mere a little nervous, but one could easily argue that much of the Hardware for TSpace hasn&#8217;t been developed a whole lot either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Zaitcev</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2007/02/02/deals-for-planetspace-tspace/comment-page-1/#comment-73712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Zaitcev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/02/02/deals-for-planetspace-tspace/#comment-73712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be just me, but don&#039;t these two items look quite dissimilar? The t/Space is realistic, whereas PlanetSpace seems like a fantasy. But NASA treats them the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be just me, but don&#8217;t these two items look quite dissimilar? The t/Space is realistic, whereas PlanetSpace seems like a fantasy. But NASA treats them the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
