<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setback for RpK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/09/25/setback-for-rpk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/09/25/setback-for-rpk/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/09/25/setback-for-rpk/comment-page-1/#comment-23769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2006/09/25/setback-for-rpk/#comment-23769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s my suspician that a good part of the reason Kistler won was the presence of Orbital Sciences, Aerojet, and Lockheed Martin on their team.  It gave them credibility with NASA, and presumably with potential investors.

While this cannot be interpreted as good news, I would note that Lockheed can undoubtedly do the work that Orbital would have done.\

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my suspician that a good part of the reason Kistler won was the presence of Orbital Sciences, Aerojet, and Lockheed Martin on their team.  It gave them credibility with NASA, and presumably with potential investors.</p>
<p>While this cannot be interpreted as good news, I would note that Lockheed can undoubtedly do the work that Orbital would have done.\</p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
