<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Divining clues about Bigelow&#8217;s plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/18/divining-clues-about-bigelows-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/18/divining-clues-about-bigelows-plans/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Foust</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/18/divining-clues-about-bigelows-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2006/05/18/divining-clues-about-bigelows-plans/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam: It&#039;s true that polar ground stations, like those in Alaska and northern Scandanavia, are commonly used for polar-orbiting remote sensing and telecom satellites.  And there would be some benefit to have a tourist platform in a polar orbit, since visitors would thus be able to see all of the planet once a day (twice counting nighttime), rather than a narrower band available in lower-inclination orbits.  However, there&#039;s the challenge of launching into polar orbit.

Bigelow&#039;s decision may instead reflect the availability of commercial ground station locations, and the fact that at least his initial demonstration payloads will be launched from Baikonur and thus into 51+-degree orbits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam: It&#8217;s true that polar ground stations, like those in Alaska and northern Scandanavia, are commonly used for polar-orbiting remote sensing and telecom satellites.  And there would be some benefit to have a tourist platform in a polar orbit, since visitors would thus be able to see all of the planet once a day (twice counting nighttime), rather than a narrower band available in lower-inclination orbits.  However, there&#8217;s the challenge of launching into polar orbit.</p>
<p>Bigelow&#8217;s decision may instead reflect the availability of commercial ground station locations, and the fact that at least his initial demonstration payloads will be launched from Baikonur and thus into 51+-degree orbits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Dinkin</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/18/divining-clues-about-bigelows-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Dinkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2006/05/18/divining-clues-about-bigelows-plans/#comment-889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Alaska mean he&#039;s launching in polar orbit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Alaska mean he&#8217;s launching in polar orbit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
