<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oklahoma spaceport license soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/06/oklahoma-spaceport-license-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/06/oklahoma-spaceport-license-soon/</link>
	<description>Tracking the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Spaceflight &#187; Spaceport news</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/06/oklahoma-spaceport-license-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Personal Spaceflight &#187; Spaceport news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2006/05/06/oklahoma-spaceport-license-soon/#comment-2637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oklahoma&#8217;s spaceport at the former Clinton-Sherman Air Force Base has received its operators license from the FAA&#8217;s Office of Commercial Space Transportation. (The announcement was rather low-key: while the FAA issued a press release about the license, that press release isn&#8217;t available on FAA&#8217;s web site; see RLV and Space Transport News for the full text of the release, which apparently got a scattershot email distribution.) It&#8217;s certainly a big step forward for the spaceport, although one that had been anticipated for some time: over a month ago at ISDC, George French of Rocketplane Kistler said that the license would be official &#8220;in the next two weeks&#8221;. In his MSNBC article, Alan Boyle notes that the license &#8220;gives Oklahoma an edge in the nascent space tourism industry&#8221;, although that edge may be illusory: other planned spaceports, most notably New Mexico, will likely have their FAA licenses well in advance of any commercial operations planned from them, so it will come down to the ability of the companies that plan to operate from them to carry out their business plans. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Oklahoma&#8217;s spaceport at the former Clinton-Sherman Air Force Base has received its operators license from the FAA&#8217;s Office of Commercial Space Transportation. (The announcement was rather low-key: while the FAA issued a press release about the license, that press release isn&#8217;t available on FAA&#8217;s web site; see RLV and Space Transport News for the full text of the release, which apparently got a scattershot email distribution.) It&#8217;s certainly a big step forward for the spaceport, although one that had been anticipated for some time: over a month ago at ISDC, George French of Rocketplane Kistler said that the license would be official &#8220;in the next two weeks&#8221;. In his MSNBC article, Alan Boyle notes that the license &#8220;gives Oklahoma an edge in the nascent space tourism industry&#8221;, although that edge may be illusory: other planned spaceports, most notably New Mexico, will likely have their FAA licenses well in advance of any commercial operations planned from them, so it will come down to the ability of the companies that plan to operate from them to carry out their business plans. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Dinkin</title>
		<link>http://www.newspacejournal.com/2006/05/06/oklahoma-spaceport-license-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Dinkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2006/05/06/oklahoma-spaceport-license-soon/#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finding of no significant impact (&quot;FONSI&quot;) is actually the hardest, most expensive part of the licensing process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding of no significant impact (&#8220;FONSI&#8221;) is actually the hardest, most expensive part of the licensing process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
